Calculating Minimum Distance p+q

  • Thread starter Thread starter Callisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum distance p + q for a given focal length using the lens formula 1/p + 1/q = 1/f, the relationship between p and q can be analyzed. The derived relationship shows that p + q reaches its minimum at 4f. Calculus is used to confirm that the critical points occur at p = 0 or q = 0, but these are inadmissible as they lead to undefined values in the lens equation. The discussion emphasizes that both p and q must be greater than zero for the equation to hold true. Thus, the minimum distance is established as 4f, excluding zero as a valid solution.
Callisto
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi Peaple :!)

How do you determine the minimum distance p+q between the object and image for given focal length given

1/p + 1/q = 1/f

this may seem trivial, but i can't figure it out.
any tips please

Callisto
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Arent p and q distances...? Just add them.
 
If your saying given a fixed focal length, find the relationship between p and q, that case

\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = k

Solve it for either p or q (the result is the same) and graph it. I believe its a logarithmic relation, but I'm not sure.
 
What math tools do you have at your disposal?

Actually the thin lens relationship is a hyperbola.
 
I should know that, my brother did a presentation on it a week ago.
 
solving 1/p+1/p=1/f for p
i get
-qf/(f-q)
now i substitute this into p+q, then i get -q^2/(f-q).
now if i use calculus to find the minimum value i differentiate -q^2/(f-q) and let it equal zero so
d/dq= -q(2f-q)/(f-q)^2 =0 when q = 0 or 2f

Repeating this process for p then p = 0 or 2f
so the minimum distance is
p+q=4f. why is it not zero

am i completely wrong?any comments.

Callisto
 
Looks fine to me. You might want to check that 2f is a minimum (not a maximum or point of inflection), to be thorough. Looking at the lens equation itself do you see why the 0 solutions are inadmissible?
 
Last edited:
1/0+1/0=0 , 0 doesn't = 1/f
therefore 0's are excluded from the problem, correct?
Callisto
 
1/0 + 1/0 is 0? Are you sure?
 
  • #10
1/0+1/0=1/0, 1/0 doesn't = 1/f
is this why 0's are excluded?
 
  • #11
1/0 is undefined, as is 1/0+1/0, and no other arithmetic with these quantities is defined either, so if p or q were 0, you could not rearrange the equation the way that you did (without first defining a new arthmetic). In order for the lens equation to make sense with usual definitions, the assumption p, q not zero must be made.
 
  • #12
Thanks
2f must be minimum since if the object p is at infinity then 1/p=0 so q = f for an object at infinity.
 
Back
Top