Calculating Molarity of NaOH in a Titration/pH Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter emc92
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the molarity of NaOH in the titration problem, first determine the moles of cyclohexylaminoethanesulfonic acid using its mass and formula mass (FM 207.29). Next, find the pKa from the provided table to understand the acid's dissociation. The pH of 9.24 indicates the solution is basic, suggesting that the NaOH has fully reacted with the acid. Finally, use the volume of NaOH added (22.63 mL) to calculate its molarity based on the moles of acid neutralized. This process will yield the required molarity of the NaOH solution.
emc92
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
When 22.63 mL of aqueous NaOH was added to 1.226 g of cyclohexylaminoethanesulfonic acid (FM 207.29, structure in the table) dissolved in 41.37 mL of water, the pH was 9.24. Calculate the molarity of the NaOH.

How do I start this calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most likely finding pKa in the table.

Please don't ignore the template, it is there to help you organize your thoughts, and to help us point you in the right direction.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry Moles of NaOH to Create Buffer Solution pH=6 in 0.42M Ethanoic Acid
Replies
3
Views
3K
What is the Importance of Choosing the Correct Endpoint in a Titration?
Replies
7
Views
4K
Aqueous Equilibrium: Ka of an Unknown Acid via Titration
Replies
2
Views
2K
What Volume of NaOH is Required for Back Titration in Simple Back Titration?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Titration Troubles: Where Did We Go Wrong?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Chemistry How much NaOH I have to add to increase pH?
Replies
3
Views
5K
Titration of acetic acid w/ NaOH problem
Replies
2
Views
2K
Equilibrium distribution of a solvent in two immiscible solvents
Replies
1
Views
2K
Amount of base needed to titrate to pH 10.00
Replies
2
Views
3K
How Does Pre-existing CH3COONa Affect Buffer pH Calculation?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top