Calculating Moment of Inertia for an Asymmetrical Barbell Shape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for an asymmetrical barbell shape with masses of 9 kg and 5.59 kg at either end of a 2-meter boom, which is assumed to be massless. The shape consists of octagonal prisms, and the mass is evenly distributed, allowing for the use of point masses for simplification. The center of gravity is calculated to be approximately 0.77 meters from the heavier end, using torque balance equations. Suggestions include empirical measurement once the satellite is built and using software like Pro-E for precise calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the inertial properties for satellite design.
iceburn182
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the moment of inertia for an assymetrical barbell shape. The mass as one end of the 2 meter boom is 9kg and at the other is 5.59kg. The boom or rod is a balloon-like tube and I am going to assume it is massless. I am using this information to calculate thrust impulses for a satellite. Can you help? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the reply,

The two halves are octogonal prisms with height 9" and a distance of 18" vertex to vertex. We are assuming for now that the mass is evenly distributed about the volume, because hardware hasn't been placed within it. However, the Icm will remain blanced for all angles about the axis of lowest inertia (that running lengthwise through the boom).

I could use the shape of a point masses or spherical masses separated by a massless rod, but I was curious about doing it as the actual shape. Any comments?
 
Is the thing built already?

If you can't calculate it, you should be able to empirically determine it (assuming it isn't too delicate).
 
Regular right octagonal prisms? (i.e., a volume swept out by vertically translating a regular octagon?)

Do you mean, the boom runs through the symmetry axes of the prisms, so the entire structure has a (eightfold) rotational symmetry about the boom axis?


correct on both of your comments, Ambitwistor

I will look into your suggestions as soon as I have time to get back to this. (School is busy right now)

enigma,

The satellite isn't built yet - still on the design board. In the future, we will find its inertial properties with a rigid boom and placed components.

thanks, for the ideas. If you have any more I'll check back.
 
The simplest thing to do- and it will probably be pretty accurate- is to assume that the two end masses are "point masses". That is, that their mass is concentrated at a point at the end of the barbell.

Let "x" be the distance from the 9 kg mass end to the center of gravity. Then there is a "torque" (twisting force) around the center of gravity of 9gx (g is the acceleration of gravity so that 9g is the weight). Since the boom has length two meters, the distance from the other, 5.59 kg mass, at the other end, to the center of gravity is 2- x meters. The torque around the center of gravity due to that weight is 5.59g(2-x). In order that the two "balance" (which is the whole point of "center of gravity"), we must have 5.59g(2-x)= 9gx. Of course, the "g"s cancel and we have 11.18- 5.59x= 9x so the equation is 14.59x= 11.18 or x= .77. The center of gravity is approximately 0.77 meters from the heavier 9 kg end.
 
You know, I think you can actually build the thing in Pro-E and have it compute the moment of inertia for you.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top