Calculating Negative Electric Charge of Oxygen Gas at STP

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the negative electric charge of all electrons in a 56-liter sample of diatomic oxygen gas (O2) at STP, one must first determine the number of O2 molecules in that volume. This involves using the ideal gas law or a related formula to find the number of molecules present. Each O2 molecule contains a specific number of electrons, which can be multiplied by the total number of molecules to find the total charge. The discussion emphasizes the importance of independently researching the necessary formulas rather than relying on others for direct answers. Understanding the foundational concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
dtrain121
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the negative electric charge of all the electrons in a 56 liter sample of oxygen gas at STP. Assume the oxygen gas is diatomic.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Diatomic, of course, means that each oxygen molecule contains 2 oxygen atoms (ie, O2). Cool. So you know you have 56 liters of a gas, oxygen here, at STP. Do you have a formula that would allow you to calculate how many molecules of O2 gas would occupy that much volume? After you calculate that, its a simple matter of finding out how many electrons each O2 molecule contains, and multiplying your number of molecules by the number of electrons in each molecule by the total charge of each electron.

Hope this helps, reply if you need more clarification! I've deliberately avoided simply giving you the formulas, of course.
 
he did not give me any formulas. i would not know where to start. can you please give me the formulas?
 
dtrain121 said:
he did not give me any formulas. i would not know where to start. can you please give me the formulas?

You need to start by calculating the number of atoms of the gas that are contained in a 56 liter container, at STP-- ie, 1 atmosphere, and 0 degrees C.

No, I will not give you the formula. You should be able to find this one on your own. It's one of the more famous formulas out there. Have you even looked for it? Or thought about where you could?

We're not here to do your work for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top