Calculating Net Force and Electric Field Using Coulomb's Law - Homework Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force and electric field acting on charge A due to two equal and opposite charges B and C. The net force on charge A is calculated using Coulomb's Law, yielding a force of 1.35 N from each charge, which are then combined vectorially. The participant questions the method of adding forces at 45 degrees versus using x and y components, seeking clarification on the equivalence of these approaches. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying vector addition to determine the net force and electric field. The calculations for the electric field result in an approximate value of 190,919 N/C, highlighting the need for accurate vector analysis.
kurt1992
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is the charge distribution:B
|
|
| 2.0 m
|
|
A------------C
2.0 m

A = 2.0*10^-5 C
B = -3.0*10^-5 C
C = -3.0*10^-5 C

a) Find the net force on the charge

b) what is the net electric field acting on the charge

Homework Equations



FE=kq1q2/r^2

electric field = Fnet/q

The Attempt at a Solution



a) The charges acting on A are equal and at equal distance so they are then same.

F_E=(9.0*10^9)(2.0*10^-5)(-3.0*10^-5)/2^2

F_E=5.4/4

F_E=1.35 N

Each charge has a net force of 1.35 Newtons on charge 1. However, force is a vector quantity so the vectors have to have the same direction in order to add them. (The forces are the same so we can simply multiply the hypotenuse of the electric force by 2 to find the net force on particle 1.

(F_E/cos45)(2)=Fnet

3.81838=Fnet

Direction N45E

(is this correct? my books solution to the problem involves adding x and y components which make a very confusion solution.)

b)

ε=3.81838/(2.0*10^-5)
ε=190919 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kurt1992 said:
(F_E/cos45)(2)=Fnet
That's not right. Is that what you meant to write?
 
yes, i thought adding the vectors together at 45 degrees would be the same as adding x and y components and then using trigonometry to find the magnitude.
Is it not equivalent?
 
kurt1992 said:
yes, i thought adding the vectors together at 45 degrees would be the same as adding x and y components and then using trigonometry to find the magnitude.
Is it not equivalent?
Yes, if done correctly. Your answer was almost right, so I wondered if it was just a typo. If it's what you meant to post, please post your full working.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top