Calculating Net Torque for an Inclined Wheel: A Problem in Applied Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net torque on an inclined wheel about its axle, with specific values for forces and distances provided. The user initially calculates two torque values but struggles with a third component due to its angle, suspecting the need for trigonometric functions. Despite providing calculations, the user receives feedback indicating that crucial steps were omitted, particularly the computation of the last torque contribution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the direction of torque and ensuring all components are accurately included in the final sum. Clarification and further assistance are sought to resolve the misunderstanding in calculations.
Erenjaeger
Messages
141
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Find the net torque on the wheel in the figure below about the axle through O, taking a = 13.0 cm and b = 31.0 cm. (Assume that the positive direction is counterclockwise.)
pic: https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd...._=1470130918_26fa32f17821823200ba75439cef0a52
[/B]

Homework Equations

τ=f⋅d[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


just sum all for torque, I thought you could just go
τ1=9.0N ⋅ 0.31m = 2.79 n⋅m
τ2=10.0N⋅0.31 = 3.1 N⋅ m
but the torque component with the angle shown, I calculated it the same and then summed all the values of torque together, and it said it was wrong, so I am assuming that you have to add something like a cosine or sine into that component because it isn't in a horizontal or vertical direction but 150° below the horizontal (positive x axis) any tips on how to solve this,?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Erenjaeger said:
I calculated it the same
This does not actually show us what you did. Please specify the values you put in and the result you got.
 
Orodruin said:
This does not actually show us what you did. Please specify the values you put in and the result you got.
i don't understand how it doesn't show what i did? i completely explained what i did. the two net torques i gave how i calculated them and got 2.79 N.m and 3.1 N.m and said i did the same for the third component so obviously following that i went 12.0N x 0.13m which gave me 1.56 N.m, then i said i summed all my values for torque together, thus 2.79+3.1+1.56 which equals 7.45N.m but that value was incorrect. Does that explain it anymore or was there something else you need to know??
 
Erenjaeger said:
i completely explained what i did.
No, you left out this initially:
Erenjaeger said:
following that i went 12.0N x 0.13m

Erenjaeger said:
2.79+3.1+1.56
Think about directions (more precisely, "sense").
 
Erenjaeger said:
i don't understand how it doesn't show what i did? i completely explained what i did.
No you did not, you left out a crucial part, your computation of the last contribution and the final result. Haruspex has already given you a good hint. Try to interpret it and ask again if you still cannot work it out.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top