Calculating Polarization Intensity: Theta Values of 45 and 25 Degrees Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter lozah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the intensity of light transmitted through three polarizing sheets with specific angles. For theta values of 45 degrees, the calculations yield correct results, with the final intensity being 0.125 of the incident intensity. However, for theta at 25 degrees, the initial calculations were incorrect because the angle for the third sheet should be adjusted to 65 degrees, reflecting the orientation of the crossed polarizers. After correcting the angle, the participant successfully arrived at the right answer. The importance of adjusting the angle based on the configuration of the polarizers is emphasized.
lozah
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two polarizing sheets have their transmission axes crossed so that no light gets through. A third sheet is inserted between the first two such that its transmission axis makes an angle θ with that of the first sheet. Unpolarized light of intensity I0 is incident on the first sheet. Find the intensity of the light transmitted through all three sheets for the following values of θ.

The two values of theta are 45 and 25 degrees.

Homework Equations


I(transmitted)=I(incident)*(cos(theta))^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I got all of the answers right for theta = 45 degrees. Through the first polarizer, it was 0.5, then 0.25, then 0.125, but I can't seem to get the answer right for theta = 25 when it's gone through all of the polarizers.

The first two I got like this:
I1 = I0 * 0.5
I2 = (I0*0.5)(cos25)^2 = 0.411 * I0
I3 = (I0*0.411)(cos25)^2 = 0.337 * I0

But my answer for I3 is wrong. Can anyone help me? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lozah said:
I1 = I0 * 0.5
I2 = (I0*0.5)(cos25)^2 = 0.411 * I0
I3 = (I0*0.411)(cos25)^2 = 0.337 * I0

But my answer for I3 is wrong. Can anyone help me? Thanks.

The 25 degrees for I3 is not correct. Can you see why?
 
TSny said:
The 25 degrees for I3 is not correct. Can you see why?
Yup I just got it right before I got the notification that you replied! It should be 65 degrees because that is the change in angle from 25 degrees to 90 degrees (in order to accommodate the fact that the outer two polarizers have their transmission axes crossed). THANKS!
 
OK, Good!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top