Calculating Power to Drag 100kg Log Down 20° Hillside at 0.50 m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoMeGusta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Log Power
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the power required to drag a 100-kg log down a 20° hillside at 0.50 m/s, one must consider the forces involved, including friction and gravitational potential energy. The work done against friction is represented as W_f = -μmgL cos(θ), while the change in potential energy is ΔU = -mgL sin(θ), where m is mass, g is acceleration due to gravity, and L is the length of the slope. The total power exerted by the man is given by P_man = μmgv cos(θ) - mgv sin(θ), resulting in a value of 247 J. The distinction between work and thermal energy in overcoming friction is noted but considered a minor point in this context. Understanding these calculations is essential for accurately determining the power needed in this scenario.
NoMeGusta
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What power must a man expend on a 100-kg log that he is dragging down a hillside at a speed of 0.50 m/s ? The hillside makes an angle of 20 degrees with the horizontal and the coefficient of friction is 0.9

m = 100kg
v = 0.50 m/s
\theta = 20 degrees
\mu = 0.9

From here I thought that W_{man} + W_{f} = \Delta U

So, W_{f} = - \mu mgL \cos{\theta} (that I understood), from here the books states that \Delta U = 0 - mgL \sin{\theta} Where did the book get this? What does the 0 represent? How do I find the Power?

The book then says that P_{man} = \mu mgv \cos{\theta} - mgv \sin{\theta} = 247J

Can someone walk me thru this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U is the proper variable symbol for potential energy, gravitational potential energy in this case.

The mgL \sin{\theta} is another way of say "mgh," but on this slope (think triangle), h is the opposide side where L is the hypotenuse. mgh is the change in potential energy. The work done by the guy has to do two things: change the potential energy of the log, and overcome friction.

Conceptual rant:
Depending of conventions and definitions, sometimes the work done to overcome friction is not called "work" but "the mechanical equivalent of heat." That last bit is a mouthful, and I haven't seen it too often in textbooks lately, so I guess it's OK to call it work; the only problem is that it is not a transfer of mechanical energy if it turns to thermal energy, it should be called heat. Alas this distinction is low on the scale of hair-splitting importance.[/concpetual rant]
 
What instrument do you play hemidemisimiquavers? I thought 16th notes were fast enough... geez, I can only imagine 64ths
 
NoMeGusta said:
What instrument do you play hemidemisimiquavers? I thought 16th notes were fast enough... geez, I can only imagine 64ths
I can handle short trills on the piano that are "hemis.":approve: As long as its with fingers 2 & 3 (the thumb is #1 on the piano)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top