Calculating pressure coeff. in triangular panel method

  • Thread starter Thread starter pjmab101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of pressure coefficients in a triangular panel method for a 3D panel method program. Participants explore the challenges of adapting existing methods for quadrilateral panels to triangular panels, which may vary in shape, size, and orientation. The focus includes theoretical aspects, mathematical reasoning, and boundary conditions relevant to the implementation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach to calculating doublet strengths and expresses difficulty in determining pressure coefficients for triangular panels, seeking advice on adaptation from quadrilateral methods.
  • Another participant inquires whether the original problem pertains to a lifting surface or multi-component body, indicating a potential application context.
  • A suggestion is made to compute finite differences at the sides of the triangular panels to derive local disturbance velocities, which could then be used to interpolate the velocity at the control point of the panel.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the use of constant strength doublets and the meaning of "FD," which is identified as finite difference.
  • A participant mentions developing equations for the triangular panel method and seeks guidance on defining boundary conditions, questioning whether they need to be defined at all nodes or can be centered on the triangular panel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying approaches and uncertainties regarding the adaptation of methods for triangular panels, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the necessity of boundary conditions at specific locations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of vector calculations and the potential for errors in velocity components, highlighting the need for careful consideration of panel orientations and configurations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals working on computational fluid dynamics, particularly those interested in panel methods and the implementation of triangular elements in aerodynamic simulations.

pjmab101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi,

i am currently writing a 3D panel method program which uses triangular panels. i have written the part that calculates the doublet strengths on each panel and these seem to be correct. however i am having trouble determining the pressure coefficients from the doublet strengths.

now, for a four-sided panel method the local velocity tangential to the wing panel is the derivative of the doublet strength with respect to distance. this is done using a finite difference approach, by finding the change in doublet strength across adjacent panels and dividing by distance between panel control points. this is done in the spanwise and chordwise directions and then the cp is calculated as follows:

cp=1.0-((qinf+ql)^2+qm^2)/(vt^2)

where qinf is the local freestream vel, ql is local chordwise vel, qm is local spanwise vel. and vt is the freestream vel.

my problem is, how can i adapt this so that it works for triangular panels that may not be regular in shape, size or orientation?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Triangular panel methods

Hi there, I saw thata you wrote a code for triangular patches for a panel method. I wanted to ask you if your problem is for a lifting surface problem and/or multi-components body

I can't help you with your question you posted, but ifyou could tell me a little more of what you are doing, that could help because I am trying to actually modify a code for sails that is currently using quadrangular patches,

Thanks a lot,

Simone (simone.marras@gmail.com)
 
pjmab101 said:
[...] how can i adapt this so that it works for triangular panels that may not be regular in shape, size or orientation?

I had a similar concern once when I wanted to implement a 3D panel method, but never got to actually do it.

Note that pressure coefficient in potential flow at certain point depends only on local velocity at that point. The term [tex](q_\infty + q_l)^2 + q_m^2[/tex] in the formula for [tex]c_p[/tex] that you give is the local velocity squared.

So, I thought that to find [tex]c_p[/tex] at the control point of a triangular panel, one could do like this. First, compute FD at each of three sides, using this and neigboring panel doublet strength. This should give local disturbance velocity at each side middle point (and that would be a vector -- doublet-FD provides magnitude, and side normal in the plane of the panel provides direction). To this free stream velocity vector should be added, to obtain total local velocity.

Now, there are three points (panel side middle points), and three values in them (local velocity vectors). This is enough to define linear velocity distribution over the panel (ie. velocity-plane), so that velocity vector at the control point can be interpolated.

Admittedly, to work out all the vector stuff may be a bit ugly. It would certainly ease the derivation if you have vector algebra facilities in your code.

Whatever you do, please report how it turned out. May save me some time in the future, too :)

--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
 
Last edited:


Hi there, thanks so much for replying so quickly. Look, are you considering constant strength doublets on each panel? Also, what does FD mean?
Ill surely let you have all the results I come across with once I am done (might take long though cause I am working on it only in weekends!)

Thank you

s.
 
pjmab101 said:
Also, what does FD mean?

Finite differrence.

Look, are you considering constant strength doublets on each panel?

Yes, I guessed it so. That's why I said to take FDs at panel sides, as these are the only places where there are potential jumps.

Also note that by "add free stream velocity vector", I ment the component of this vector in the plane of the panel. There is no point considering panel normal direction anyway, as that component of velocity should always sum to zero -- but it won't, due to various (expected) errors.

--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
 
DFs

Thanks for replying, i just don´t understand the achronym DF that you are using
What does it mean?

thanks a lot

s.
 
Hello,

I am developing equations for triangular panel method. I have made a little progress in defining some of them. I am using triangular element with linear source and doublet distributions. could anyone help me with defining the boundary conditions. Do i have to define B.C. at all the nodes or I can define in the centre of the Triangular panel?

Thanx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 311 ·
11
Replies
311
Views
169K