Calculating Probability Current for Wave Function

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a wave function,

\psi(x)=Ae^{ik_{0}x-ax^{2}}

All I am required to do is calc. the prob. current. This I have done using the usual

j = \frac{\hbar}{m}.|A|^{2}.\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial z}

where \varphi} is the imaginary component of the exponent of e.

It comes (of course) to j = \frac{\hbar}{m}.|A|^{2}.k_{0}.

But, doing it the long way (I just thought I would), with

j = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}.(\psi*\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}-\psi\frac{\partial\psi*}{\partial x})

I end up with the same result, but e^{-2ax^{2}} attached. Since taking \psi* only changes the sign of the imaginary component, this seems inevitable... anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

Cheers :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently A from the general expression you quoted

j=\frac{\hbar}{m}|A|^{2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}

includes the real exponential...
 
T-7 said:

Homework Statement



I have a wave function,

\psi(x)=Ae^{ik_{0}x-ax^{2}}

All I am required to do is calc. the prob. current. This I have done using the usual

j = \frac{\hbar}{m}.|A|^{2}.\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial z}

where \varphi} is the imaginary component of the exponent of e.
? Where did you see this equation? It does not look right to me. are you sure this is not only for plane waves??
 
nrqed said:
? Where did you see this equation? It does not look right to me. are you sure this is not only for plane waves??

I'm thinking the simpler equation can only apply where the exponent of e in the wave function is wholly imaginary.

Using the equation

j = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}\left( \psi^{*} \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x} - \psi \frac{\partial\psi^{*}}{\partial x} \right)

I obtain

\frac{\hbar}{m}|A|^{2}e^{-2ax^{2}} k_{0}

I presume that's correct. In which case, I don't think the e^{-2ax^{2}} should be absorbed into A. The probability current is a function of x.

Hmmm.
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top