Calculating Probability for Harmonic Oscillator States

AI Thread Summary
To find the probability of a particle being in a particular state of a harmonic oscillator, one must calculate the inner product or overlap integral between the wave function psi(x,0) and the state functions U(x). Although the initial wave function is defined from -x0 to x0, integration can be performed over this range since the wave function is zero outside of it. The correct approach involves integrating psi(x,0) multiplied by U(x) from -x0 to x0 and then squaring the result. This method effectively captures the probability of the particle being in the specified state. Understanding the overlap integral is crucial for accurate probability calculations in quantum mechanics.
eku_girl83
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
I have the U(x) functions for the ground state and first excited state of the simple harmonic oscillator. I also have the psi (x,0) wave function for this situation. How do I find the probability the particle is in a particular state? Is it simply the integral of psi(x,0) * u(x) dx evaluated from -x0 to x0... and then the square of this value?

Or am I totally off base with this?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi eku_girl,

You have the right idea except that you have to remember to integrate over all space, not just from -x0 to x0. All you're really doing is calculating the inner product or overlap integral between your state and the states of definite energy. This quantity tells you how much your state psi looks like the ground state or first the excited state or whatever you put in there.

Hope this helps.
 
The psi (x,0) is defined from -x0 to x0 in the problem. Do I still integrate over all space?
 
I see, your initial wavefunction vanishes outside of -x0 to x0? Sorry for the confusion; yes, you should integrate from -x0 to x0. In fact, you can think about integrating over all space except that the wavefunction is zero outside of -x0 to x0 so it all works out alright.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top