Calculating Probability of Excited State of Harmonic Oscillator

  • Thread starter Thread starter quickclick330
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
AI Thread Summary
An ideal harmonic oscillator has energy levels that are consistently separated by 0.05 eV. When this oscillator is at a temperature of 150 K, the probability of it being in the first excited state can be calculated using the Boltzmann factor. The relevant formula involves the energy separation, the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and the absolute temperature. For this scenario, terms beyond the first excited state can be neglected due to their rapid decay. The calculated probabilities for the first excited state range from 0.021 to 1.000, with the correct value determined through the appropriate application of the Boltzmann distribution.
quickclick330
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Harmonic Oscillator

9. An ideal harmonic oscillator has energy levels separated by a constant 0.05 eV. That
is, the difference between the ground state and the first excited state of this oscillator is
an energy of 0.05 eV. This single oscillator is brought into contact with a large solid
composed of an enormous number of oscillators, and characterized by a temperature of
T=150 K. What is the probability that the single oscillator will be found in its first excited
state?
1. 0.021
2. 0.055
3. 0.098
4. 0.144
5. 0.234
6. 1.000


What relationship should I even start with? Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a simple Boltzmann factor problem.

Recall that the probability of an individual energy level is:

exp(-e/(kT))/sum(exp(-ne/(kT))

where

e is the separation between energy levels
k is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (make sure you get its units right!)
T is the absolute temperature

in this case, we can neglect all terms n > 1 as they decay rapidly to zero. Also, recal that the energy level for the ground state is 0.

That should help you complete the problem.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top