Calculating Probability of Multiple Rolls on a D6

  • Thread starter Thread starter RDLowrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
RDLowrider
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I play a dice game using a D6 to work out results. Sometimes you need to make multiple rolls and I'd like to be able to work out probabilty of getting certain results.

1st roll of a D6 needing 3+
If the first roll fails you get a second try again needing 3+
If either roll gets 3+ you roll again this time needing 4+
If succesfull you roll once more needing 4+

Any help with how to work this out would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
RD
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The probabilty of getting "3+" (3 or more?) is 4/6= 2/3. The probability of not getting a "3+" is 1- 2/3= 1/3 and if that happens you roll again, the probability of getting "3+" on the second roll is again 2/3. The probabilty of getting a "3+" on the first roll or on the second roll is (2/3)+ (1/3)(2/3)= 6/9+ 2/9= 8/9.

Assuming that happens, your probability of getting "4+" (4 or more) on the next roll is 3/6= 1/2. If you are successful in that, the probability of getting "4+" on your last roll is also 1/2. The probability of all of those things happening is (8/9)(1/2)(1/2)= (8/9)(1/4)= 2/9.
 
Many thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top