B Calculating Probability with Random Variables and Constants

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello all,

I have a question:

Suppose I want to find the following probability:

Pr\left[\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2+1}\leq\gamma\right]

where ##\alpha_i## for i=1, 2 is a random variable, whatever the distribution is, and ##\gamma## is a constant. Can I write it as

Pr\left[\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2+1}\leq\gamma\right]=\int_{\alpha_2}\Pr\left[\alpha_1\leq\gamma(\alpha_2+1)\right]\,f_{\alpha_2}(\alpha_2)\,d\alpha_2

where ##f_{\alpha_2}(\alpha_2)## is the p.d.f of the random variable ##\alpha_2##, or I need to average over the distribution of ##\gamma(\alpha_2+1)##?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The integral is exactly this "average". Should work like that, assuming α2+1 > 0.
 
  • Like
Likes EngWiPy
Pr(\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2 +1}\le \gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1 \le (\alpha_2+1)\gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1-\alpha_2 \times \gamma \le \gamma).. The last expression is in the form of a sum of (presumed independent) random variables. There is a standard expression, involving convolution of the individual distributions. This assumes \alpha_2+1 \ge 0.
 
  • Like
Likes EngWiPy
mathman said:
Pr(\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2 +1}\le \gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1 \le (\alpha_2+1)\gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1-\alpha_2 \times \gamma \le \gamma).. The last expression is in the form of a sum of (presumed independent) random variables. There is a standard expression, involving convolution of the individual distributions. This assumes \alpha_2+1 \ge 0.

Thanks. Could you give more details on how to find your last probability in terms of the individual pdfs of the independent random variables?
 
Hey S_David.

If you have a function of a random variable you can use the transformation theorem to get the new PDF for the new random variable.

For the sums look at convolution or probability generating functions if they are independent or use the joint and/or conditional distributions to get the probability.
 
  • Like
Likes EngWiPy
Just to clarify that: the approach in post 1 is fine, the approach with the convolution will lead to the same thing, just expressed in a different way.
 
  • Like
Likes EngWiPy
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Back
Top