Calculating Probability with Random Variables and Constants

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello all,

I have a question:

Suppose I want to find the following probability:

[tex]Pr\left[\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2+1}\leq\gamma\right][/tex]

where ##\alpha_i## for i=1, 2 is a random variable, whatever the distribution is, and ##\gamma## is a constant. Can I write it as

[tex]Pr\left[\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2+1}\leq\gamma\right]=\int_{\alpha_2}\Pr\left[\alpha_1\leq\gamma(\alpha_2+1)\right]\,f_{\alpha_2}(\alpha_2)\,d\alpha_2[/tex]

where ##f_{\alpha_2}(\alpha_2)## is the p.d.f of the random variable ##\alpha_2##, or I need to average over the distribution of ##\gamma(\alpha_2+1)##?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[itex]Pr(\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2 +1}\le \gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1 \le (\alpha_2+1)\gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1-\alpha_2 \times \gamma \le \gamma)[/itex].. The last expression is in the form of a sum of (presumed independent) random variables. There is a standard expression, involving convolution of the individual distributions. This assumes [itex]\alpha_2+1 \ge 0[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EngWiPy
mathman said:
[itex]Pr(\frac{\alpha_1}{\alpha_2 +1}\le \gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1 \le (\alpha_2+1)\gamma)=Pr(\alpha_1-\alpha_2 \times \gamma \le \gamma)[/itex].. The last expression is in the form of a sum of (presumed independent) random variables. There is a standard expression, involving convolution of the individual distributions. This assumes [itex]\alpha_2+1 \ge 0[/itex].

Thanks. Could you give more details on how to find your last probability in terms of the individual pdfs of the independent random variables?
 
Hey S_David.

If you have a function of a random variable you can use the transformation theorem to get the new PDF for the new random variable.

For the sums look at convolution or probability generating functions if they are independent or use the joint and/or conditional distributions to get the probability.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EngWiPy
Just to clarify that: the approach in post 1 is fine, the approach with the convolution will lead to the same thing, just expressed in a different way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EngWiPy