Calculating Projectile Trajectories: Aerodynamics of a 2.5cm Ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter sigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aerodynamics Ball
AI Thread Summary
A user has developed software to calculate projectile trajectories considering air resistance, specifically for a 2.5 cm diameter ball weighing approximately 5 g. The drag force is modeled as F = -k * A * v^2, where k is the drag coefficient and A is the frontal area. The user seeks guidance on determining the constant k for a smooth sphere launched at speeds of 5 - 7 m/s. Additional resources were provided for further information on drag coefficients. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using SI units for calculations.
sigma
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi! I've written a simple software to calculate projectile trajectories when air resistane can't be neglected. I'm planning to test the software with a light ball and a cannon.

My model simply say
F = -k * A * v^2
The force of drag F is proportional to the velocity v squared. k and A are constant of drag and frontal area respectively.

Can anyone tell me what the constant k would be for a sphere?

The ball I'm planning to use is about 2.5 cm in diameter, weighs about 5 g (guess) and is pretty smooth. It will be launched at speeds of about 5 - 7 m/s.

If the information is insufficient, please ask.

Edit: Please use SI units, thanks!

//Sigma
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top