Calculating Pulley and Shaft Loads for an Existing System

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force from the belt at the pulley, the radius, not the diameter, must be used; thus, the force is 930 N when using the 390 Nm breakdown torque divided by the pulley radius of 0.42 m. The torque at the locking device is equivalent to the pulley torque, as all components are interconnected. The rated torque of the locking device is significantly higher than the breakdown torque, indicating it is adequate for the application. The tension in the belt reflects the difference in tension between its two sides, and the tangential force can be calculated using the formula: tangential force multiplied by the radius equals torque. Overall, the system appears to be properly rated for the existing conditions.
Stephen123
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, i need to do a pulley/shaft check on an existing system.

Pulley is 840mm diameter and the motor has 47kw and 390 nm breakdown torque so to find the force from the belt can i assume that the force at the pulley o.d. distance is the force? So 390*0.84 will give the torque at that distance?

I also need to check that the shaft to pulley locking device is adequate. I have the rated Nm of the locking device but how do i find the load torque through the locking device?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Stephen123 said:
So 390*0.84 will give the torque at that distance?
For pulley torque or force, the pulley radius is needed, not the pulley diameter.
Force at pulley radius is 390 Nm / 0.42 m = 930 N.
You should not need to know the locking device or shaft diameter. The locking device torque will be the same as the pulley torque.
 
Baluncore said:
For pulley torque or force, the pulley radius is needed, not the pulley diameter.
Force at pulley radius is 390 Nm / 0.42 m = 930 N.
You should not need to know the locking device or shaft diameter. The locking device torque will be the same as the pulley torque.

When you say the locking device torque will be the same as the pulley torque, what do you mean by pulley torque? The locking device locks the shaft to the pulley and is rated for 12,000Nm of torque. How can i actually find what the torque at the locking device is?

Thanks
 
Torque is independent of radius until you need to convert it to a linear force.
Tangential (force in Newtons) * (radius in metres) = (torque in Newton∙metres), Nm.

Stephen123 said:
When you say the locking device torque will be the same as the pulley torque, what do you mean by pulley torque?
The tension in the belt measured in Newton, N, multiplied by the radius of the pulley, is the pulley torque. Since all parts are connected together the pulley torque, shaft torque and the locking device torque are all the same.

To work out the tangential force at the locking device you need the radius of the locking surface, but that is NOT needed in your example.
The 390 Nm breakdown torque is significantly less than the lock rating of 12 kNm so there should be no problem.
 
Baluncore said:
Torque is independent of radius until you need to convert it to a linear force.
Tangential (force in Newtons) * (radius in metres) = (torque in Newton∙metres), Nm.The tension in the belt measured in Newton, N, multiplied by the radius of the pulley, is the pulley torque. Since all parts are connected together the pulley torque, shaft torque and the locking device torque are all the same.

To work out the tangential force at the locking device you need the radius of the locking surface, but that is NOT needed in your example.
The 390 Nm breakdown torque is significantly less than the lock rating of 12 kNm so there should be no problem.

I understand what you mean now Baluncore, that makes sense. Thank you for the help!
 
In case it matters...belts are pre-tensioned. The force calculated above is the difference in tension between the two sides of the belt.
 
  • Like
Likes Swapnil Karale
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top