Calculating Recoil Speed: Mass, Arrow and Velocity

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the recoil speed of a person shooting an arrow, the conservation of momentum principle is essential. The correct formula is (M1*V1) + (M2*V2) = (M1 + M2)*Vf, where M1 is the mass of the person, M2 is the mass of the arrow, V1 is the velocity of the arrow, and Vf is the recoil speed of the person. The initial confusion stemmed from incorrect unit conversion between grams and kilograms. Properly applying the momentum conservation equation will yield the correct recoil speed. Accurate unit conversion is crucial for solving this type of physics problem.
DStan27
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
can anyone help me with this problem ?? if i am given the mass of a person shooting and arrow, the mass of the arrow and the velocity at which the arrow was shot, what formula could i use to find the the recoil speed of the person.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i've tried using (M1*V1)+(M2*V2) = (M1+M2)*Vf but that didn't work. I've also tried to use M1V1 = M2V2 a couple of ways but can't get the right answer. am i even close to using the right equation??
 
Yes you are trying to conserve momentum. You need to use the first one but in a different way.
 
ok, thanks i was actually doing it right but I'm an idiot and converted g to kg wrong.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top