Calculating Recoil Velocity of Cobalt-60 Nucleus Emitted Gamma Ray

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the recoil velocity of a cobalt-60 nucleus after it emits a gamma ray with a specific wavelength. The user is confused about the mass calculation, specifically why the atomic mass of cobalt (60) is multiplied by the mass of a proton (1.67 x 10^-27 kg) to determine the nucleus's mass. It is clarified that the calculation pertains to the total number of nucleons in the cobalt nucleus, which consists of both protons and neutrons, and that their masses are similar. The mention of cobalt's charge is deemed irrelevant to the mass calculation, as it is based solely on nucleon count. Understanding this distinction resolves the user's confusion regarding the mass of the cobalt nucleus.
Astronomer186
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A radioactive nucelus (cobalt - 60, has 27 p+'s and 33 e-'s) emits a photon (gamma ray) of wavelength 2.7 x 10^-13 m. Assuming the nucleus was intially at rest, what si its recoil velocity upon emitting this photon?

I have already figured out the momentum using this information. When I looked at the solution guide of how to find the mass, I am not sure why they use:

m = 60(1.67 x 10^-27 kg)?

to figure out the mass? I mean, I can understand the number 60, because that's the atomic mass, but why multiply it by the mass of a proton? Cobalt has two charges: 2+ and 3+. The most common one is 2+, so why multiply it by the mass of a proton, rather than an alpha particle (which has a 2+ charge)?

If someone can explain this, that would be greatly appreciated, because I am so confused. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're talking about the mass of a cobalt nucleus and not the charge. Cobalt 60 has 60 nucleons and there is little difference between the masses of protons and neutrons.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top