Calculating Relative Speed in One-Dimensional Collisions

AI Thread Summary
In a one-dimensional collision problem involving a 45kg girl and a 150kg plank on a frictionless surface, the girl walks at 1.5 m/s relative to the plank. Initially, the discussion focused on using momentum equations, but confusion arose regarding the correct setup of velocities. The correct approach involves recognizing that the collision is perfectly inelastic, leading to the conclusion that the girl's speed relative to the ground is 1.15 m/s, while the plank moves at -0.346 m/s. The key takeaway is that in such problems, one should assume inelastic collisions unless specified otherwise. Understanding the relationship between the velocities of the girl and the plank is crucial for solving these types of problems.
Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
327
Collision in One Dimension?

Problem:

A 45kg girl is standing on a plank that has a mass of 150kg. The plant, originally at rest, is free to slide on a frozen, lake (flat, frictionless surface). The girl begins to walk along the plank at a constant speed of 1.5 m/s relative to the plank. What is her speed relative to the ice surface?

My Attempts:

Firstly, I tried m1v1=m2v2 thinking it was a simple momentum problem.

I later realized it was under collision in one-dimension, and judging by the deffinition, I assume it is an elastic collision.

So I continued on, both 'perfectly inelastic' and 'elastic' equations. In one example, I named v1 to be (1.5-v2), but now I'm so confused that I can't even rationalize which title the 1.5m/s belongs too. Is it v1 or is v1 1.5-v2?


Books Answers:


speed of plank: -.346 m/s
her speed relative to ground: 1.15 m/s

(this makes it obvious that her speed minus on the plank, plus the speed of the plank is her speed relative to the ground, but I'm still having problems setting this thing up.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you had it right the first time. It is a simple momentum problem. The momentum of the girl is 45(v + 1.5) where v is the velocity of the plank.
 
Parth Dave said:
I think you had it right the first time. It is a simple momentum problem. The momentum of the girl is 45(v + 1.5) where v is the velocity of the plank.

I finally figured it out. It actually ended up being a perfectly inelastic equation! :eek:
 
You should assume all of the collisions to be inelastic, unless it's said that it's elastic.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top