Calculating Relativity with Different Speeds: Vacuum or Medium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter User11037
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
User11037
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is probably a silly question but I can't seem to find the answer anywhere:

are the effects of relativity calculated with reference to the speed of light in a vacuum or the speed of light in the medium in which you are traveling? For instance, if traveling in water, would the Lorentz factor be calculated based on c ≈ 3e8 or c ≈ 2.2 e8?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Speed of light in a vacuum. The physics of light traveling through a medium are very different; the light is being continuously scattered, absorbed, re-emitted by the atoms of the medium. You could imagine the light being absorbed by an atom, then being re-emitted after a delay, traveling at c through the vacuum between atoms, then being absorbed and delayed again.

It's possible for a particle to travel through a medium at a speed greater than the speed of light in that medium; but not faster than c.

In fact, it would be more accurate to say that "c is the speed of a massless particle in a vacuum and light, being massless, travels at that speed in a vacuum" than "c is the speed of light". We don't, but that's for historical reasons - when relativity was being developed we didn't know about the other things that propagate with speed c.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
As a result of the relativistic properties being based on the speed of light in vacuum, while it is not possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, it is possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in water. That has been observed in water cooled nuclear reactors.
 
HallsofIvy said:
As a result of the relativistic properties being based on the speed of light in vacuum, while it is not possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, it is possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in water. That has been observed in water cooled nuclear reactors.

How is that possible? Seems to violate causality, and I guess mass/energy equivalence since the electron has a mass.

Is it better said as An electron can move faster than a photon through a medium under xyz conditions; both speeds are less than c*.

*speed of light in a vacuum
 
Well, yes, the whole point is that the speed of light in water is less than the speed of light in vacuum. The whole point is that relativity uses the speed of light in vacuum and an electron can move faster than the speed of light in water. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
 
nitsuj said:
How is that possible? Seems to violate causality, ...

It seems to me that Causality is related to the maximum signal speed.
The "speed of light in vacuum" happens to equal that maximum signal speed.

The speed of light and of other particles in a medium is more about their interactions with the medium... with causality only playing a role in setting an upper speed limit.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top