Calculating Resistance in Prototype Boat using Formula of Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter welovephysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resistance of a prototype boat based on the resistance of a smaller model. The model boat, at a 1/100 scale, experiences a resistance of 0.12N at a speed of 5m/s, prompting the need to determine the corresponding resistance for the full-sized prototype. Participants clarify that the force can be expressed in terms of water density, characteristic length, and velocity, emphasizing that resistance is related to the cross-sectional area rather than volume. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how the volume of water displaced relates to the dimensions and speed of the boat. Ultimately, the correct volume swept by the leading face of the boat is determined to be proportional to the model's dimensions and speed.
welovephysics
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A model boat 1/100 size of its prototype has 0.12N of resistance when stimulating a speed of 5m/s of the prototype , what is the corresponding resistance in the prototype ? water is the fluid in both cases and frictional forces can be neglected.
Why the author need to transform the force into ρ(L^2)(v^2) ?
I know the unit of force is kg(m)(s^-2) , so , IMO , F is directly proportional to L only , right . but , not (L^3)
Fr = Fp / Fm
iqbzhu9.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
welovephysics said:
Why the author need to transform the force into ρ(L^2)(v^2) ?
I know the unit of force is kg(m)(s^-2) ,
That's for an accelerating mass, the mass being constant. Here, it's the water that is being moved, and the mass of that is related to the cross-sectional area (L2) and the velocity.
 
haruspex said:
That's for an accelerating mass, the mass being constant. Here, it's the water that is being moved, and the mass of that is related to the cross-sectional area (L2) and the velocity.
since we do not know the mass of water ( we only know the density of water) , so we use (rho)(L^3 ) to find the mass of water ?
 
welovephysics said:
since we do not know the mass of water ( we only know the density of water) , so we use (rho)(L^3 ) to find the mass of water ?
That would be true if we were considering a cube of water of side L, but L is the characteristic dimension of the model/prototype. How does the mass of water displaced in time t relate to L, t, ρ and v?
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
haruspex said:
That would be true if we were considering a cube of water of side L, but L is the characteristic dimension of the model/prototype. How does the mass of water displaced in time t relate to L, t, ρ and v?
ρ(L^3) [(L) / (T^-2) ] , which is ρ(L^3)v what are you trying to say ?
 
welovephysics said:
ρ(L^3) [(L) / (T^-2) ] , which is ρ(L^3)v what are you trying to say ?
No, that's not it. The object moves at speed v. Think of it as a box of side L. What volume of water has to move aside to make way for it in time t?
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
haruspex said:
No, that's not it. The object moves at speed v. Think of it as a box of side L. What volume of water has to move aside to make way for it in time t?
L^3 ?
i don't really understand what you are trying to say , can you explain further ??
 
welovephysics said:
L^3 ?
i don't really understand what you are trying to say , can you explain further ??
How far does the box move in time t? What volume does the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance?
 
haruspex said:
How far does the box move in time t? What volume does the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance?
the box will move by L in time , t , am i right ? the volume that the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance is (L^3) ?
 
  • #10
welovephysics said:
the box will move by L in time , t , am i right ?
It is moving at speed v, not L/t.
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
  • #11
haruspex said:
It is moving at speed v, not L/t.
so , what are you trying to say , i didnt get you
 
  • #12
welovephysics said:
so , what are you trying to say , i didnt get you
If a car length L moves at speed v for time t, how far does it go?
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
  • #13
haruspex said:
If a car length L moves at speed v for time t, how far does it go?
car move by vt
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
If a car length L moves at speed v for time t, how far does it go?
is it correct ??
 
  • #15
welovephysics said:
car move by vt
Yes, so try answering my post #8 again.
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
  • #16
haruspex said:
How far does the box move in time t? What volume does the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance?
distance moved = vt , volume of the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance is vt + L
 
  • #17
welovephysics said:
distance moved = vt , volume of the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance is vt + L
How do you get vt+L? Maybe it would help you to think about a more solid analogy. You are digging a tunnel. The excavator is a cube LxLxL. If it advances a distance vt, how much soil does it have to excavate? Draw a picture.
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
  • #18
haruspex said:
How do you get vt+L? Maybe it would help you to think about a more solid analogy. You are digging a tunnel. The excavator is a cube LxLxL. If it advances a distance vt, how much soil does it have to excavate? Draw a picture.

Still vt + L
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0050.JPG
    DSC_0050.JPG
    18.9 KB · Views: 510
  • #19
haruspex said:
How do you get vt+L? Maybe it would help you to think about a more solid analogy. You are digging a tunnel. The excavator is a cube LxLxL. If it advances a distance vt, how much soil does it have to excavate? Draw a picture.
sorry , the volume of the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance is (L^3) , what are you trying to say ?
 
  • #20
welovephysics said:
sorry , the volume of the leading face of the box sweep through as the box advances that distance is (L^3) , what are you trying to say ?
No.
Think about this... if it went for twice as long, 2t, still at speed v, would it still be the same volume?
 
  • Like
Likes welovephysics
  • #21
haruspex said:
No.
Think about this... if it went for twice as long, 2t, still at speed v, would it still be the same volume?
no
 
  • #22
welovephysics said:
no
So it can't be L3, right?
If the leading face is LxL and advances distance vt, what shape does it 'carve out'? What are the dimensions of that shape?
 
  • #23
haruspex said:
So it can't be L3, right?
If the leading face is LxL and advances distance vt, what shape does it 'carve out'? What are the dimensions of that shape?
what shape ? i am getting more confused now
 
  • #24
welovephysics said:
what shape ? i am getting more confused now
Lay a light box, LxLxL, on soft snow. Press down on it, pushing it down a distance vt. Remove the box. What shape hole have you made in the snow? What is its volume?
 
  • #25
haruspex said:
Lay a light box, LxLxL, on soft snow. Press down on it, pushing it down a distance vt. Remove the box. What shape hole have you made in the snow? What is its volume?
volume = (L)(L)( L +vt) , shape = rectangular , is it correct ?
 
  • #26
welovephysics said:
volume = (L)(L)( L +vt) , shape = rectangular , is it correct ?
Nearly right. But we are only interested in the volume swept out by the leading face. That moves a distance vt, not L+vt.
 
  • #27
haruspex said:
Nearly right. But we are only interested in the volume swept out by the leading face. That moves a distance vt, not L+vt.
so the volume = (L)(L)(vt) ?
 
  • #28
welovephysics said:
so the volume = (L)(L)(vt) ?
Yes!
 
Back
Top