Calculating Rotational Inertia: Hoops vs. Solid Cylinders

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for different shapes, specifically comparing hoops and solid cylinders. Participants are exploring the implications of the problem statement regarding energy stored and the correct interpretation of the geometry involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correct expression for moment of inertia, particularly whether it applies to a hoop or a solid cylinder. There is also discussion about the need to convert units from revolutions per minute to radians per second.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on understanding the definitions of a disc and a solid cylinder, while others have pointed out potential issues with unit conversions and the reasonableness of calculated values. The conversation reflects an ongoing exploration of the problem without a clear consensus on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the definitions and assumptions related to the shapes involved, as well as the implications of unit conversions in their calculations. There is a noted confusion regarding the terminology used in the problem statement.

goonking
Messages
434
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Cd9E26L.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume the energy stored is = 1/2 (I) (ω^2)

I (moment of inertia) is MR^2 since it's a hoop? or is it a solid cylinder?

do we need to convert the rpm (revolutions per minute) to radians per sec?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track, just realize that a disc is a cylinder with vanishing height.

Otherwise yeah, try it out and report back on what you end up with. It'll be important to do a sanity check on the answer that you get - that'll tell you whether you got the right answer or not most of the time.
 
MaxwellsCat said:
You're on the right track, just realize that a disc is a cylinder with vanishing height.

No, that's a thin disk. A disk is a solid cylinder.

goonking said:
do we need to convert the rpm (revolutions per minute) to radians per sec?

As you defined it, ω is angular velocity, which is typically measured in radians per second.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I should have been explicit - I meant a solid cylinder.
 
after doing all the math, answer came out to be 1.4 x 10^6 Js.
 
So right away there's something wrong - the units should be J not J##\cdot##s, unless you meant Joules :P

Does that answer make sense? In the context of the problem, does that seem reasonable?
 
MaxwellsCat said:
So right away there's something wrong - the units should be J not J##\cdot##s, unless you meant Joules :P

Does that answer make sense? In the context of the problem, does that seem reasonable?
yes, i meant joules.
 
goonking said:
after doing all the math, answer came out to be 1.4 x 10^6 Js.
Seems too low. Check your conversion from revolutions to radians.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K