Calculating Rotational Inertia of Flat Plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter azizlwl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the rotational inertia of a flat plate, emphasizing the need to evaluate the integral in two dimensions rather than one, as with a thin rod. The formula for rotational inertia is presented as I = ∫ r² ρ dV, where r is the distance from the axis of rotation and ρ may depend on r. Participants clarify that the integral should be evaluated over the volume of the body, and they suggest using a small rectangular element to apply the parallel axis theorem for calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the geometry involved in the integration process. Overall, the thread provides insights into the mathematical approach for calculating rotational inertia for flat plates.
azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10
How to derive the Rotational Inertia for a flat plate.
I do not see any symmetry about the axis of rotation as in a thin rod.http://imageshack.us/a/img845/1134/53433231.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you just calculate it from the definition:

I = \int r^{2} \rho \mathrm{d}V

The difference here is that the integral has to be evaluated in two dimensions. For a thin rod you can eliminate two coordinates (it's a one-dimensional body); this is a two-dimensional body.
 
Thank you.
Can you elaborate more.
Can you tell me what r represents in your equation?
Your equation is antiderivatives not definite integral.
 
Last edited:
Okay, r is the distance of the point you're evaluating to the axis of revolution. So \rho is generally a function of r too.

It is a definite integral (I should have written \int_V instead of \int. You integrate over the volume of the body. That's why you only evaluate in one dimension for a thin rod, but two dimensions for a thin plane.
 
Hey Azizlwl,

Take a rectangular element of length a and height as given at a distance r from the axis. Make the width very small i.e. dr. What is the moment of inertia of this element about the axis? (Use parallel axis theorem). Now integrate. you will get your answer.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top