Calculating Satellite Line Splitting in a Sunspot using the Zeeman Effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength split of the hydrogen Balmer alpha line due to the Zeeman effect in a sunspot with a magnetic field of 0.1 T. The user struggles with converting the frequency change into a wavelength difference, initially encountering issues with incompatible units. They recognize that the electron charge must be correctly applied in their calculations to yield valid results. After some confusion regarding the symbols and units, they find that using the correct value for the electron charge resolves their calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics problems.
interdinghy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"The normal Zeeman effect splits a spectral line at frequency \nu_{0} and two satellite lines at \nu_{0} ± eB/(4\pi m_{e}). By what amount (in angstroms) are the satellite lines of the hydrogen Balmer \alpha line (\lambda_{0} = 6562.81 Å) split from the central component in a typical sunspot?

Given value for B in a sunspot: .1 T

Homework Equations



\lambda = c/\nu
d\lambda = c d/d\nu

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried plugging things into eB/(4\pi m_{e}) to find the change in frequency for the satellite lines, but I'm not getting a value in hertz, so I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing wrong. I'm pretty sure that once I get an actual frequency out of this I can just use the relevant equations to find the difference in wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you calculate the individual wavelengths and take their difference? or did you calculate the difference in frequency and calculate a wavelength with that?
 
If I calculate the frequency based off the given wavelength, I get 4.56*10^14 hertz, but that doesn't get me any further I don't think.

The problem is the difference between the initial frequency and the satellite lines. I can't add or subtract the difference because the difference isn't a frequency, it's some nonsense units (seconds^-2 ampere^-1).
 
Try writing out the units of each piece in the SI base units. See what happens.
 
frogjg2003 said:
Try writing out the units of each piece in the SI base units. See what happens.

I think this is maybe where I'm missing something?

A tesla divided by an electron mass is giving me 1 per second per ampere, and wolfram seems to agree with this.

\nu_{0} + s^{-1}A^{-1} = Hz + s^{-1}A^{-1} is adding incompatible units, so I'm pretty sure I can't do it.
 
What about the electron charge?
 
Also, I'm getting per second squared in Wolfram.
 
Oh okay I see now. I was so sure e was the base of the natural log. I actually tried looking around for other things it could stand for, but putting it in as the electron charge on wolfram made it work.

Thanks!
 
Back
Top