Calculating satellites´ period of revolution

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the period of revolution for a satellite orbiting 4200 km above Earth's surface, the Earth's radius must be added to the altitude. The acceleration of gravity at that height differs from the standard 9.8 m/s², and centripetal acceleration must also be considered. Importantly, the mass of the satellite is not needed for this calculation, as the gravitational and centripetal accelerations will balance each other. Understanding these concepts clarifies the overall approach to solving the problem. This foundational knowledge is essential for accurately determining the satellite's orbital period.
JukuJohannes
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Earths´ satellite orbits 4200km above Earths surface. Count satellites´ trajectory circle-shaped and calculate satellites´period of revolution.

The Attempt at a Solution


I added the Earths´ radius to the 4200 km, which represents the orbiting attitude and then my mind crashed...
please some helpo:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

What is the acceleration of gravity at that height? (Hint: it's not 9.8)

What other acceleration is there from circular motion?
 
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

What is the acceleration of gravity at that height? (Hint: it's not 9.8)

What other acceleration is there from circular motion?

Of course the centripetal-acceleration but I thought that I should know the mass of the satellite to calculate the acceleration of gravity...

btw.. thanks for the welcome
 
JukuJohannes said:
Of course the centripetal-acceleration but I thought that I should know the mass of the satellite to calculate the acceleration of gravity...

btw.. thanks for the welcome

Since the 2 accelerations will need to offset to stay in orbit, you won't need the mass.
 
LowlyPion said:
Since the 2 accelerations will need to offset to stay in orbit, you won't need the mass.

yeah, that settles it down, I think I can see the big picture now,
Thank You!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top