Calculating Second Moment of Area about X and Y Axes - Example Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bradracer18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Moment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the second moment of area for the curve defined by y²=x, specifically from the origin to x=4 inches. The user, Brad, is uncertain about the limits of integration and whether to consider negative values of y, as the curve extends into both quadrants. He correctly identifies the height of the curve at y=2 and attempts to compute the moment about the x-axis using the integral Ix = ∫(y² * dA). The conversation clarifies that since the area of interest is in the first quadrant, integrating from 0 to 2 for y is appropriate, confirming that his approach is on the right track. Overall, the key focus is on ensuring the correct limits of integration for the specified area.
Bradracer18
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok, I have the normal Y(up) and x(to the right) axis. I've got the curve(starting at orgin) y^2=x. On the x axis, it goes to x =4 inches. So, that is the area I'm looking at(shaded).

Question states this:

Find the second moment of the shaded area with respect to
a) x - axis
b) y - axis

I'm not exactly sure how to do this...but I tried.

Oh, and I found the top of the curve, is at y=2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




Ix = int(y^2 * dA)

= int(from 0 to 2)(y^2 *(4-y^2) dy = 4.27in^4

Is this portion correct? I'm not sure

Thanks,
Brad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An integral dA is an integral over an area. So you will get a double integral over dx and dy. Look up an example.
 
I have looked at examples...I'm fairly confident this is how they did it.

Where do you see that I went wrong? I think my equations are correct...
 
Yes, your basic equations are good. Sorry. I didn't realize you'd already done the x integration. But draw the figure and think about your limits of integration.
 
I have the picture drawn, on my paper here.

I was thinking, that due to integrating in terms of y, I should integrate from zero to the height of the curve.

So, if x=4, then y = sqrt(4) = 2. This is why zero to 2 seemed logical to me.
 
Why not -2 to +2 in y? Does it say only y>=0? If you've included a picture, I can't see it.
 
no...i didn't include a pic...I said, in the first post(confusing, I know)...that we are starting at (0,0)...like the axis is at the beginning of this curve(coming out of orgin)...I can post a pic, if you'd like...with paint.
 
Don't include a pic. It's probably not necessary. But can y be negative? I know x can't.
 
Nope...both start at 0,0...then goes out to 4 inches on the x axis...with that curve(y^2=x)...and need to find how tall it is(on the y-axis).
 
  • #10
The curve y^2=x has both of the points (4,2) and (4,-2) on it. So the area enclosed between x=4 and x=0 has regions both above and below the x-axis. I'm asking if you are being specifically asked to not include the region below. If so then your answer is already correct.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
ok...Yes, I've only got a picture of quadrant 1 Guess that is how I should have put it, all along...

Ok...that is great...thank you!
 
Back
Top