Calculating Semimajor Axis of Meteor Orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter crystalplane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Meteor Orbit
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the semimajor axis of a meteor's orbit, one must first estimate its speed at Earth's position without gravitational interference. Gathering data from multiple observers can help determine the meteor's trajectory and speed at various points. Utilizing the Runga-Kutta method allows for back-calculating the meteor's velocity before atmospheric entry. Applying conservation of energy principles will provide the speed absent Earth's gravitational effects. This process ultimately enables the derivation of the meteor's original orbital elements.
crystalplane
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
if i know a meter is observed at an altitude of 6km, to be traveling with an initial velocity of 20 km/s and the decelerating at a rate dv/dt=0.2km/s^2, which formula i should use to get the length of the semimajor axis of the meteor'orbit?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
crystalplane said:
if i know a meter is observed at an altitude of 6km, to be traveling with an initial velocity of 20 km/s and the decelerating at a rate dv/dt=0.2km/s^2, which formula i should use to get the length of the semimajor axis of the meteor'orbit?

You would have to estimate the speed the meteor would have at Earth's position if Earth had not been in the way to accelerate it with gravity and then decelerate it with atmosphere. Probably you'd want multiple observers with multiple exposures on film so that you could know the direction of meteor flight and deduce the speed of the meteor between each observed position. Then use Runga-Kutta to back out the velocity before it hit the atmosphere. Then apply the conservation of energy to get the speed in the absence of Earth's gravitational acceleration. Then you can infer what the hypothetical unperturbed state vector of the meteor would have been, and from there you can derive the elements of the meteor's former orbit.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top