Calculating Spring Compression of Ore Car on Downhill Mine Tracks

AI Thread Summary
An ore car with a mass of 38,000 kg rolls downhill, compressing a spring with a constant of 5.2 × 10^5 N/m after descending 6.5 m. The work done by gravity on the car is calculated using the formula W = mgd, equating it to the spring's potential energy, W = 1/2 kx^2. The calculations yield a spring compression of approximately 3.05 m, which rounds to 3.1 m when considering significant figures. Despite initial confusion regarding the rounding, the unrounded answer was accepted as correct. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and adherence to significant figures in physics problems.
Idividebyzero
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
1.An ore car of mass 38000 kg starts from rest
and rolls downhill on tracks from a mine. At
the end of the tracks, 6.5 m lower vertically,
is a horizontally situated spring with constant
5.2 × 105 N/m.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 .
Ignore friction.
How much is the spring compressed in stop-
ping the ore car?




2. W=F*D W=1/2 kx2



3. Started with 1/2kx2 the constant is given to us. work is also F*D here once it leaves the hill I considered it in free fall. so using force of gravity as F.
(m)(g)(d)=1/2kx2 and solved for x. this was incorrect. thought about the work-energy principle but i don't know any kinematic inforation other than g and the vertical displacement. any thoughts
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The method looks good.

What do your calculations look like? What did you get for an answer?
 
Yeah there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it =\
 
here is what i got

W=1/2kx^2

mgd=1/2kx^2

(38000kg)(9.8m/s^2)(6.5m)=1/2(5.2e5)x^2
(2420600 kgm^2/s^2)=260000*x^2
9.31 = x^2
3.05 = x

using the correct sig figs would round to 3.1 and the answer was wrong
 
weird, just tried submitting 3.05 m and it was correct. that was the un-rounded raw answer before sig figs. My professor made it clear to use sig figs when doing the assignment. :anger:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top