Calculating Spring Constant and Energy Conservation: How Fast Will the Bag Drop?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the spring constant and analyzing the motion of a 3kg bag attached to a vertical spring. The spring constant was initially calculated as k=73.5 N/m based on the formula k=mg/x. Participants debated the correct application of energy conservation principles to determine the bag's velocity after dropping 40 cm and the maximum distance it would fall before reversing direction. Clarification was sought on whether to use gravitational potential energy (GPE) solely for kinetic energy (KE) calculations or to include elastic potential energy (EPE) as well. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining GPE lost to find the bag's displacement and acceleration at various points in its motion.
MarieMarie94
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
1. Problem Statement:
A vertical spring has one end attached to the ceiling and a 3kg bag attached to the other one. When the system is at rest, the spring is stretched by 40cm. 1) determine the spring constant. 2) Let the bag drop from a position in which the spring is not deformed. Using the conservation of energy law, find: how fast the bag is moving after it drops 40 cm, and how far down the bag will drop before starting to come back. Calculate and show the direction of the bag's acceleration when the bag is at the highest, lowest, and middle of the oscillation positions.

Homework Equations

:[/B]
K=mg/x
KE=1/2m(v^2)
GPE=mgh
EPE=1/2k(x^2)

3. Attempt at the Solution:
So I found a spring constant. I'm not sure if it's correct but I got, k=(3)(9.8)/(.4)= 73.5 N/m. I ran into problems with the rest though. For finding the velocity of the bag dropping 40cm, I did GPE=KE+EPE but I'm not sure if that's right. As for the farthest distance the bag would drop and the acceleration, I wasn't exactly sure how to approach them.

Update: To find the velocity at 40cm, should it actually only be GPE=KE because we're treating the 40cm as our equilibrium? And then to find the farthest distance the bag would drop would it be GPE=EPE to find our displacement? Or am I completely wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
MarieMarie94 said:
GPE=KE+EPE
GPE lost = KE gained + EPE gained, yes.
MarieMarie94 said:
to find the farthest distance the bag would drop would it be GPE=EPE to find our displacement
Yes, but what is the GPE lost in this case?
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but what is the GPE lost in this case?
Would it be (3)(9.8)(d) because we don't know the distance?
 
MarieMarie94 said:
Would it be (3)(9.8)(d) because we don't know the distance?
Right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top