Calculating t from Rearranged Equation: z=a+b(e^k*t -1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter martine
  • Start date Start date
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
How do I calculate t from the following equation?

z=a+b(e^k*t -1)

Guess this should be right to start with:

t=ln(z/b)

but what to do with the a and -1? and how do I calculate ln(z/b)? as lnz/lnb? I've tried thinking (didn't work *smirk*) and trial and error with simple numers (didn't work either)

thanks a lot!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, am I correct in presuming that you mean:

<br /> z = a + b (e^{kt} - 1)<br />

? If so, then you need to group the exponent with parentheses; the correct way to write it is z=a+b(e^(k*t) -1).

(Order of operations says you do exponentiation before multiplication)


Anyways, this is a chance to use stuff you've learned previously. :smile: It looks like you want to use the fact:

<br /> x = b^y \rightarrow \log_b x = y<br />

right? However, note that the exponentiation has to be by itself on one side of the equation. Do you know how to do that?


how do I calculate ln(z/b)?

Compute z/b then take the log, just like the expression states.
 
Yes, that equation of yours is what I meant. Should have read the faw on how to write equations in a forum.

I also understand the equation you wrote further down, but I guess I'm really to stupid to rearrange teh whole equation to t=...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top