Calculating Tangent Vector to Curve: $\varphi$

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Tangent
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tangent vector to the curve defined by the equation \( r = R(1 - \varepsilon \sin^2 \varphi) \). Participants clarify the need for a proper basis when defining vectors, emphasizing that the tangent vector in polar coordinates requires consideration of both radial and angular components. The correct expression for the tangent vector is derived as \( t = \frac{\partial s(\varphi)}{\partial \varphi} \vec{e}_r + \vec{e}_\varphi \), where \( \vec{e}_r \) and \( \vec{e}_\varphi \) are the unit vectors in polar coordinates. Misunderstandings about vector components and their definitions are addressed, highlighting the importance of correctly applying calculus in polar coordinates. The conversation ultimately leads to a refined understanding of how to compute the tangent vector accurately.
skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Calculate the tangent vector to a curve $$r=R(1-\varepsilon \sin ^2 \varphi)$$ as a function of ##\varphi##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, I tried like this:

I defined a vector $$(f(\varphi),\varphi)=(R(1-\varepsilon \sin ^2 \varphi),\varphi)$$ and than I calculated the derivative $$\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi}$$ therefore my result is $$(-\varepsilon R \sin(2\varphi),1).$$

But I have a friend claiming that the result is $$(-\varepsilon R \sin(2\varphi),R(1-\varepsilon \sin ^2 \varphi)).$$ So, my question to you is... which is right? :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you've computed the normal. You need to find a vector such that your vector dotted with it give zero. I think both of you are wrong.
 
First of all: What basis are you using to write down your vector? Unless you specify a basis, your two numbers mean nothing. What basis is your friend using?

Edit: Second, how do you define the tangent vector of a curve?
 
Orodruin said:
First of all: What basis are you using to write down your vector? Unless you specify a basis, your two numbers mean nothing. What basis is your friend using?

It's polar basis ##r## being the distance from the origin and ##\varphi ## the polar angle.

The function $$R(1-\varepsilon \sin ^2\varphi)$$ turns out to be an ellipse. ##R## and ##\varepsilon ## are two constants, where ##\varepsilon \ll 1##.
 
skrat said:
It's polar basis ##r## being the distance from the origin and ##\varphi ## the polar angle.

And what is the definition of the tangent vector of a curve?
 
Yeah that could be the reason why my result is wrong.

If I am not mistaken, the vector is ##(f(\varphi),\varphi)## and normalized tangent vector should be $$t=\frac{(\frac{\partial f(\varphi)}{\partial \varphi},\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi}\varphi)}{|(f(\varphi),\varphi)|}$$
 
skrat said:
Yeah that could be the reason why my result is wrong.

If I am not mistaken, the vector is ##(f(\varphi),\varphi)## and normalized tangent vector should be $$t=\frac{(\frac{\partial f(\varphi)}{\partial \varphi},\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi}\varphi)}{|(f(\varphi),\varphi)|}$$

Your big problem is that you are trying to only deal with the components of a vector, and even the components you quote are wrong. For any curve ##\vec r(t)##, the tangent vector is given by ##\vec t = d\vec r/dt##. In polar coordinates, the position vector ##\vec r## is given by ##\vec r = r \vec e_r##, where ##\vec e_r## is the radial unit vector. There is no component in the angular direction.

However, you do need to note that ##\vec e_r## is not a constant vector and in order to differentiate this with respect to time, you will also need to consider the time derivative of ##\vec e_r##. This is a big disadvantage of trying to write everything as a list of numbers only. The first step is to stop referring to vectors as a list of numbers without any reference as to what basis is being used.
 
Ok, let's write $$\vec r=R(1-\varepsilon \sin ^2 \varphi)\vec e_r=s(\varphi)\vec e_r$$ than tangent vector ##\vec t## is $$\vec t=\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi }s(\varphi) \vec e_r+s\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi }\vec e_r.$$ The second term is $$\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi }e_r=\frac{\partial }{\partial \varphi }(\cos\varphi, \sin \varphi)=(-\sin\varphi,\cos\varphi) $$ but IF (and only if) I am not mistaken, than by definition $$\vec e_\varphi =s(-\sin\varphi,\cos\varphi).$$ Meaning the tangent vector is $$t=\frac{\partial s(\varphi)}{\partial \varphi }\vec e_r + \vec e_\varphi .$$
 
skrat said:
$$\vec e_\varphi =s(-\sin\varphi,\cos\varphi).$$

There is an ##s## too much in front here. Remember that ##\vec e_\varphi## is a unit vector.

Meaning the tangent vector is $$t=\frac{\partial s(\varphi)}{\partial \varphi }\vec e_r + \vec e_\varphi .$$

And one too few in front of the ##\vec e_\varphi## here. Otherwise you are doing well now.
 
  • Like
Likes skrat

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K