Calculating Temperature Increase From Hand Rubbing Work

AI Thread Summary
Rubbing hands together generates thermal energy through work done against friction, with the problem involving 10 rubs over 7.50 cm at a frictional force of 45.0 N. The work can be calculated using the formula work = force * distance, leading to a total energy input. To find the temperature increase, the specific heat capacity of human tissue is needed, which is approximately 3470 J/(kg⋅°C). Assuming 100% efficiency in energy conversion, the work done translates entirely into heat, allowing for the calculation of temperature change. The discussion concludes with the realization that the specific heat capacity is key to solving the problem.
narutoish
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Rubbing your hands together warms them by converting work into thermal energy. If a woman rubs her hands back and forth for a total of 10 rubs a distance of 7.50 cm each and with a frictional force averaging 45.0 N, what is the temperature increase? The mass of tissue warmed is only 0.100 kg, mostly in the palms and fingers.

Homework Equations



work = force * distance

The Attempt at a Solution



i can find the work, but after that I don't know how to connect that to temperature change.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of the work is converted to heat, I would go with Q = cmΔT , but I have no idea what c is for human skin, tissue, cells or whatever. If you assume the process is 100% efficient, all the work done goes toward heating the skin, then all you would need is the c , the amount of energy it takes to heat up 1 kg of mass by 1 K
It is said lots of it in our body is water, the c for water is 4.2 kJ/ kgK, the surface of the skin is sweat so water again, but I'm not a beauty salon worker :/, can't help you any further at the moment.
 
Last edited:
Hi Naruto,
Specific heat capacity of human body on average is 3470 J/(kg⋅°C).So I think you should use that.
 
so does all the work convert to heat?
 
Never does. There is no further data on the assignment, therefore I can assume the process is 100% efficient.
 
Thanks guys I got it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top