Calculating temperature using NTC thermistor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Steinhart-Hart equation to calculate temperature with an NTC thermistor, emphasizing the need for accurate resistance values at reference temperatures. The resistance value of 2kΩ is confirmed as R(T0), while the resistance measured during the experiment corresponds to R(T). Clarification is provided that temperature should be expressed in Celsius for this calculation. Participants suggest consulting application notes for practical guidance and highlight the importance of correctly setting up the thermistor circuit to measure voltage drops accurately. Understanding self-heating effects of the thermistor is also mentioned as a relevant consideration.
KaK's_SLiM
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
i was doing a practical experiment using NTC thermistor. I recorded the resistance at different voltages (1v, 2v, 3v, etc) and to find the temperature i need to use the temperature coefficient formula "The Steinhart-Hart equation":

R(T) = R(T0) * [ 1 + a(T - T0) ]

where
T0 = reference temperature (deg Celsius)
T = temperature of interest (deg Celsius)
R(T0) = resistance at reference temperature (ohm)
R(T) = resistance at temperature of interest (ohm)
a = temperature coefficient of resistivity (1/deg Celsius)

i am confused to how calculate the temperature.
i know: T0 = room temperature (20 degrees C)
a = for copper wire is 0.004041
T = is what I am trying to find
R(T0) = ?? my thermistor says "resistance value to be 2kΩ" is this the value of R(T0)?
R(T) = this is the resistance value i get when passing current through copper wire

in some books I've seen the values of T to be in kelvin and sometimes in celcius. which is the correct way in this case? and instead of resistance some books replace it with "rho" for resistivity.
please help

does anyone know where i can find some example worked questions to understand this.

Slim
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
R(T) = R(T_0) \cdot [1 + a(T - T_0)]

Where,

R(T) = resistance at temperature of interest
R(T_0) = resistance at reference temperature
a = temperature coefficient of resistivity
T = temperature of interest
T_0 = reference temperature

This equation is for predicting the resistance at another temperature based on a resistance at a reference temperature. The resultant resistance is due to the temperature increase at the temperature of interest.

Example:

R(55) = R(20) \cdot [1 + 0.004041(55 - 20)

= 223.75 \cdot 1.14143

= 255.396 \Omega

The temperature should be in Celsius.

I'm not 100% sure if there is a way to relate your measured voltages to temperature using this equation so I'll let an EE chime in.

CS
 
I suggest you to take a look at the following application notes:
Analog Devices AN 709 (right now can be found here http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Application_Notes/2001119207465975025AN709_0.pdf )
Microchip AN685 - http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1824&appnote=en011704

Anyway, I don't understand what you are trying to achieve.
The formula you posted is NOT the Steinhart-Hart formula. The proper one is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinhart-Hart_equation

If you want to measure temperature using the NTC thermistor, check the app. notes above. Basically, you connect a resistor and NTC thermistor in series and measure a voltage drop on one of these components.
It is easy to get the NTC resistance then. If you know coefficients of Steinhart-Hart equation of your particular NTC, it is easy to work out the temperature of the NTC.

good luck
meereck
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top