Calculating the Capacitance of a Semicircular Dielectric Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter ganondorf29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dielectric
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the capacitance of a semicircular dielectric capacitor, the setup involves two circular metal plates with a radius of 0.55 m, separated by a 2.5 mm gap. Half of the gap is filled with a dielectric medium of constant 16.3, while the other half is filled with air. The capacitance can be approached by treating the two sections as separate capacitors, one with the dielectric and one without. The initial confusion about whether to treat them in series or parallel is clarified, with the suggestion to attempt a parallel configuration first. This method will help accurately determine the overall capacitance in nanofarads (nF).
ganondorf29
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://nplq1.phyast.pitt.edu/res/westwolf/bookauthor/Capacitors/circle.jpg

We use two circular metal plates of radius 0.55 m and thickness 8.7 mm to build a capacitor. We leave a gap of 2.5 mm between the plates and fill half of the space between the plates with a medium with dielectric constant 16.3 and leave the other half filled with air. What is the capacitance of this capacitor in units of nF?

Homework Equations



C=((eplison zero)*(dielectric constant)*(area))/2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to start this problem. I was thinking, maybe divide the area in half, one with the dielectric and one without it, and treat it as two separate capacitors in a series, but can that be done?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds reasonable to me - but wouldn't it be two caps in PARALLEL?
 
I'll try the parallel attempt first
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top