Calculating the Distance Between Two Stones Dropped Off a Cliff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rasine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    stones
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the distance between two stones dropped from a 60 m cliff, the first stone's height can be expressed using the equation x1 = xo + tvo + 0.5at^2. The second stone, dropped 1.6 seconds later, requires a similar equation adjusted for the time difference. The key is to find the time t when the stones are 36 m apart, which involves considering their velocities and the effects of gravity. Ignoring acceleration simplifies the problem since both stones fall at the same rate, allowing for a focus on their relative positions. Ultimately, determining the correct time and height equations will lead to the solution.
Rasine
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
2 stones are dropped off a 60 m cliff the second stone is droped 1.6 s after the first one. how far below the top of the cliff is the second stone when th separation between the 2 stones is 36 m?

so i am trying to use the equation x1=xo+tvo+.5at^2

then x2=xo+(t+1.6)vo+.5a(t+1.6)^2

or should i set my zero point somewhere else like where stone 2 is when the distance between the stones is 36 m?

please give me a lead
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to get an expression for the height of each stone. The expression you have there is correct (if it is for the first stone), you can simplify it quite a bit though. So what would the equation of the other stone be? I would take the top of the cliff as the zero point.

You are given the difference in height between them at a certain time, so you need to find the time t that they are 36m apart.
 
interesting wrinkle. Offhand I would think there are a few ways to the right answer. And surely you are on the right track.

I usually try to find the simplest physically intuitive approach. The way then i look at this problem is to "ignore" acceleration snce its the same for both and therefore cancels once both are in free fall and gaining velocity at the same rate. This does not mean that the distance between them is constant. So off the top of my head, I'd first figure the velocity after 1.6 sec=at. this is 15.68m/s. To reach 36m would require the time at this speed. Then backtrack for position. I may be all wet, is so someone willbe sure to say so.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top