Calculating the Distance of a Block from a Table After a Bullet Collision

AI Thread Summary
A bullet weighing 0.01 kg traveling at 400.1 m/s strikes a 4.2 kg block, embedding itself and resulting in a final velocity of 0.9504 m/s. The time for the block to fall 1.3 meters was incorrectly calculated as 0.1325 seconds, which led to an erroneous distance of 0.1259 meters. The correct approach involves using the appropriate physics formulas to determine the time of fall accurately. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency and correct formula application in physics calculations. Ultimately, the correct method provides a more accurate answer for the distance the block travels after the collision.
mikefitz
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
A 0.01-kg bullet traveling horizontally at 400.1 m/s strikes a 4.2-kg block of wood sitting at the edge of a table. The bullet is lodged into the wood. If the table height is 1.3 m, how far from the table does the block hit the floor?

I have calculated the final velocity of the bullet and block to be:

.01(400.1)=.01(Vf)+4.2(Vf)

Vf= .9504 m/s

So, now I have the velocity of the bullet embedded into the block. The time in the air is 1.3/9.82 = .1325 seconds.

.1325s * .9504 m/s = .1259 meters

Why is this wrong? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikefitz said:
So, now I have the velocity of the bullet embedded into the block. The time in the air is 1.3/9.82 = .1325 seconds.
How did you determine this? How long does it take for something to fall 1.3 meters?
 
mikefitz said:
Why is this wrong? Thanks
Your calculated time in air is wrong.
 
OlderDan said:
Your calculated time in air is wrong.

Sorry, I meant to type 1.3/9.81 = .1325 -- the 9.82 was a typo.
 
mikefitz said:
Sorry, I meant to type 1.3/9.81 = .1325 -- the 9.82 was a typo.
That is not the problem. You are not calculating time. It would help you to keep your units in your calculations. Distance divided by acceleration is not time.
 
Stupid me, I used this formula and found the correct answer: http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/Phys/Class/1DKin/U1L6b4.gif

thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top