Calculating the explosive yield of an atomic bomb

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the explosive yield of atomic bombs, specifically Little Boy and Fat Man, for a paper on the Manhattan Project. The main formula mentioned is Q = Δm * c², which relates to the energy released per fission. The user seeks reliable sources for the amount of uranium and its enrichment levels used in both bombs, as well as the energy converted during the explosions. Suggestions include comparing nuclear binding energy with chemical binding energy and using tabulated values for fission energy versus conventional explosives like Semtex. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate data and comparisons to illustrate the immense power of nuclear weapons effectively.
hoelmkjaer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm writing a paper on the Manhattan Project, and as part of this paper I am asked to show:
"... calculations that can help illustrate the explosive power of an atomic bomb compared to ordinary explosives."

Homework Equations


Released energy per fission:
Q = \Deltam * c2

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm pretty sure I know how to do this. I just need to find a reliable source (e.g. not wikipedia) and find out how many fissions actually happened in the first atomic bombs (Little Boy and Fat Man), then multiply that amount by Q. Just want to make sure this is the proper way to do this. I figured I'd look up the yield for TNT, too, and then compare the energy released by the atomic bomb to an amount of TNT with equivalent energy.
Does anyone know where I might be able to find the amount of uranium, maybe even the enrichment level of it, used in Little Boy, and the same specifications for Fat man, along with the amount of each substance actually converted into energy during the explosion?

Thanks in advance
- Hoelmkjaer
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No one knows anything?
This is killing me... Has anyone got an idea? how I could illustrate the yield of a nuclear bomb compared to conventional explosives?
 
hoelmkjaer said:
No one knows anything?
This is killing me... Has anyone got an idea? how I could illustrate the yield of a nuclear bomb compared to conventional explosives?

Compare the magnitude of the nuclear binding energy (per nucleon) with the typical binding energy of electrons. That is, the energy involved in nuclear reactions versus that involved in chemical reactions. Tables of binding energies are readily available for the elements.

Next look at the tabulated values for the energies for a specific fission. For example, the kinetic energy imparted to the fission products of plutonium (about 176 MeV per event) versus the energy released by a typical high explosive chemical reaction (this will involve a whole molecule per event -- so you can compare the energy released per unit of mass of the "reactants"). Semtex (Pentaerythritol tetranitrate) releases about 5810 kJ/kg.
 
Thank you gneill. Never thought of a comparison at the molecular level, nor a comparison between nuclear binding energy and electron binding energy.

I recon I should be able show off some satisfactory calculations with this
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top