Calculating the forces in a dropped object's impact

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greywolfe1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Impact
AI Thread Summary
To measure the force of an impact on an object without using time, one can focus on the normal force and consider the material properties of the surface it collides with. The average impact force varies significantly depending on the surface, such as steel versus marshmallows. If time measurement is impractical, measuring the distance the object travels after impact until it stops can provide useful data. Utilizing energy principles or kinematic equations may help in calculating the force based on this distance. Ultimately, the impact force is highly dependent on the characteristics of the colliding materials.
Greywolfe1982
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to think of a way to measure the force of an impact on an object (I think it would be the normal force...?) using experimental data only. Because of that I'm restricted to not using time, and I can't think of how else to calculate the force. Is there an equation that can get me started?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greywolfe1982 said:
I'm trying to think of a way to measure the force of an impact on an object (I think it would be the normal force...?) using experimental data only. Because of that I'm restricted to not using time, and I can't think of how else to calculate the force. Is there an equation that can get me started?
The impact force depends greatly on what the object is colliding with. The average impact force would be much greater if the object collided with a piece of steel versus colliding into a pile of marshmallows. If you can't meeasure the time, because it will be too small to measure, perhaps you could measure the distance that the object traverses from its initial impact to to the point where it comes to a stop. Then use energy principles or the kinematic equations. If you're dropping the object onto a hard surface, you'll be out of luck in determining the distance of the impact length; you might want to use a pile of loose sand (or marshmallows), but the impact force would be very specific to the properties of the material with which the object collides.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top