Calculating the gravitational field due to a horizontal uniform thin disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational field produced by a horizontal uniform thin disk at a distance above its center. The gravitational field's magnitude is derived using the formula 2πGρd(1-h/(R²+h²)^(1/2)). A related problem involves determining how much time a pendulum clock gains per year when placed above a 1cm thick lead layer. The user is attempting to integrate the gravitational potential equation but is uncertain about the integration limits and how to derive the necessary terms. Clarification on the integration process and limits is sought to complete the solution.
AaronKnight
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the gravitational field due to a horizontal uniform thin disc (thickness D, radius R and density r) at a distance h vertically above the centre of the disc has magnitude

2πGρd(1-h/(R2+h2)1/2)

A pendulum clock in the centre of a large room is observed to keep correct time. How many
seconds per year will the clock gain if the floor is covered by a 1cm thick layer of lead of density
11350kgm−3?
[Newton’s gravitational constant is G = 6.67×10−11Nm2 kg−2.]


Homework Equations


Gravitational potential, \phi=-Gdm/R
Where dm=2πRDρ.dR
Gravitational field, g= -\nabla\phi

The Attempt at a Solution


I have got to \phi=-2πDρGdR and I know I need to integrate with respect to R, then use the g= -\nabla\phi but I am unsure what my integration limits should be? I think I need to integrate between 0 and R but then I can't see how I would get the h/(R2+h2)1/2 term?
Any hints would be very useful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the relevant equations sections ϕ=-Gdm/R should be dϕ=-Gdm/R
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top