Calculating the Image Height from a Double-Sided Spherical Mirror

  • Thread starter Thread starter theintarnets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Image
AI Thread Summary
A man calculates the image distance from a double-sided spherical mirror, initially using the convex surface and finding a magnification of +0.22. He determines the focal length to be -12.64 cm after calculating the image distance as -9.856 cm. When switching to the concave surface, he attempts to find the new image distance but initially gets incorrect results. He suspects that the sign conventions may be causing confusion, particularly regarding the positive and negative values associated with concave mirrors. Ultimately, he realizes that adjusting the signs leads to the correct image distance of 17.6 cm.
theintarnets
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man holds a double-sided spherical mirror so that he is looking directly into its convex surface, 44.8 cm from his face. The magnification of the image of his face is +0.22. What will be the image distance when he reverses the mirror (looking into its concave surface), maintaining the same distance between the mirror and his face?

Homework Equations



m = -di/do
1/f = 1/di + 1/do

The Attempt at a Solution



First I solved for the focal length like this:

di = - (m*do)
di = - (.22*44.8) = -9.856 cm

1/f = 1/di + 1/do
1/f = 1/-9.856 + 1/44.8
f = -12.64 cm

Then I tried to solve for the image height of the concave side:

1/di = 1/f - 1/do
1/di = 1/-12.64 - 1/40.8
di = -9.856 cm

But the answer should have been 17.6, I don't really know what to do. Please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I think I got it! I think the signs in the formula switch to + for concave surfaces. When I do 1/di = 1/-12.64 + 1/44.8 I get -17.6. But I think my signs are wrong altogether, because it's supposed to be positive...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top