Calculating the luminosity density of the universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the luminosity density of the universe using the Schechter parameters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The parameters include a value for the absolute magnitude M* and the density parameter Phi*. A participant expresses confusion about correctly relating absolute magnitude M* to luminosity L*, believing they made an error in their calculations. They mention that L* should be around 10^10 and seek clarification on this relationship. The urgency of the request is emphasized due to an impending deadline for submission.
IRNB
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
l = Phi*L*Gamma(a+2)

b)

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has recently measured the following Schechter
parameters in the r passband: a = -1.16 +/- 0.03, M*= -20.80 +/- 0.03, Phi* = (1.50 +/-0.13). Given that the sun has absolute magnitude M = 4.62 in the SDSS r band, calculate the luminosity density in this band in solar units. Estimate the error on this quantity.
Gamma(0.84) = 1.122, Gamma(0.81) = 1.153, Gamma(0.87) = 1.094.

I done the entire question and then realized i had made a grave error. And this is what I think it is; I took L* as being -20.80 +/- 0.03 ie M*, and I am pretty sure this is wrong. Luminosity confuses me and I'm not sure how to relate the absolute magnitude M* to the Luminosity L*. I know that L* is supposed to be in the order of 10^10. Can anyone out there help? Its kind of urgent (due in tomorrow!).
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
sorry i posted this in the wrong section. I've posted it again in the homework section. This can be deleted if need be.
 

Thread 'Potential biosignature found in Mars rock'

Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
View full post »

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculating luminosity density of the universe
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Compute the total stellar mass from a galaxy with Red Giants
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Structure of Earth, pressure and density model
Replies
2
Views
1K
What is the Anomaly with Sirius B's Data in Astrophysics Calculations?
Replies
7
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top