Calculating the magnitude of an impulse

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nkele
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Magnitude
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the impulse delivered to a soccer ball after it bounces off a player's head. The player analyzes the change in velocity components to determine the impulse's direction and magnitude. Calculations show a magnitude of 3.03 kg·m/s, which aligns with the correct method of using the impulse equation and Pythagorean theorem. A warning is given against oversimplifying the calculation by only considering changes in velocity without proper component analysis. The correct approach emphasizes the importance of using both x and y components to ensure accuracy in future problems.
Nkele
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Aplayer bounces a 0.43-kg soccer ball off her head, changing
the velocity of the ball from
Vi = (8.8 m/s)x + (-2.3 m/s)y
to
Vf = (5.2 m/s)xN + (3.7 m/s)y
[/B]
. If the ball is in contact with the
player’s head for 6.7 ms, what are (a) the direction and (b) the
magnitude of the impulse delivered to the ball?

Will I be wrong if I use just change in velocities(ie excluding) in x-comp and y-comp to calculate direction of the impulse.

I did calculation which gave me theta of -59.03, and when using coordinates the theta falls in second quadrant.

Homework Equations


1. delta P(x comp)= Pf(x)-Pi(x)= -1.548
2. delta P(y comp)=Pf(y)-Pi(y)=2.58

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the solutions I calculated magnitude of impulse as 3.03 kg.m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks about right.
 
So is using just velocities o calculate magnitude acceptable
 
Nkele said:
So is using just velocities o calculate magnitude acceptable
If I understand correctly, you used the equation for the impulse, ##\vec J=m\Delta \vec v## to find the impulse in component form and obtained the magnitude using the Pythagorean theorem. Then you found the angle using the expression ##\theta = \arctan(J_y/J_x)##. That's how you should think of it and it is the correct method. Simplifying it to "using just velocities" is dangerous and could cause trouble next time you encounter something like this.
 
Ok, thank you very much for clarification
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top