Calculating the motion of binary stars

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the motion of binary stars, understanding Kepler's laws is essential, as they govern their orbital dynamics. Observing binary stars through a small telescope may yield limited data, especially for widely separated systems with long orbital periods. Eclipsing binaries can provide measurable periods, while spectroscopy techniques, such as analyzing Doppler shifts, offer additional insights into their motion. Accurate projections of speed and direction require comprehensive parameters, which may not be easily obtainable through basic observations. For more precise calculations, leveraging advanced data analysis methods is recommended.
hragsarkissia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is more of general question, but i am working on a project that involves binary stars. Basically, i am capturing data through a telescope, and i was wondering if i had all the parameters, how could i project, or calculate the motion of a binary star in terms of speed and direction.
Any hint would be appreciated, if you think i should approach this differently, please let me know.

I was looking at Kepler's laws to understand the motion of the stars, and i have a general idea about them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi hragsarkissia,

hragsarkissia said:
This is more of general question, but i am working on a project that involves binary stars. Basically, i am capturing data through a telescope, and i was wondering if i had all the parameters, how could i project, or calculate the motion of a binary star in terms of speed and direction.
Any hint would be appreciated, if you think i should approach this differently, please let me know.

I was looking at Kepler's laws to understand the motion of the stars, and i have a general idea about them.

I don't understand what you have at this point. Are you saying you have already calculated some general parameters from the measurements, or are you asking how to use the raw measurements?
 
If you are actually observing binary stars through a smallish telescope, there really isn't much you can determine about their motion by observation. The ones you can split in a telescope are hugely far apart and their rotation period is measured in hundreds or thousands of years, at least. You can get a period for eclipsing binaries, but not much else. Algol is famous. Other than that a lot of information about binaries comes from spectroscopy (doppler shift).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top