Calculating the Orientation of a Moving Rod Using Lorentz Transformations

AI Thread Summary
To determine the orientation of a horizontal rod moving in the positive y-direction at velocity u, while observed from a frame S' moving in the positive x-direction at velocity v, the Lorentz transformation for length contraction is applied. The rod will appear slanted due to relativistic effects, but calculating the exact orientation requires understanding the equations for the world lines of the rod's endpoints. The initial approach involves using the Lorentz transformation to convert these world lines from the unprimed frame to the primed frame. While some participants have grasped the visual representation of the rod's orientation, the algebraic calculations remain challenging for others. Clarifying the algebraic steps is essential for solving the problem accurately.
TheLawR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Problem

Horizontal rod of length x traveling along the positive y-direction at velocity u. Determine the orientation of the rod in frame S', which is moving at velocity v in positive x-direction.


2. Homework Equations

Lorentz Transformation for length contraction, x' = \gamma(x-Vt)


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I have absolutely no idea how to approach this problem. I have a basic understanding of relativity, and how the transformations work, and I know that the rod will appear slanted, but I am not sure how to calculate in which direction.

Any help understanding this concept is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try writing down the equations for the world lines of the endpoints of the rod in the unprimed frame. Then use the Lorentz transformation to find the world lines in the primed frame.
 
I was able to figure out how it would look like, and how it would be oriented. But we were offered extra credit for doing the algebra. I can't figure out how to work the algebra, or where to start.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top