Calculating the potential of a uniformily charged spherical solid

noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the potential inside and outside uniformily charged spherical solid whose radius R and whose total charge is q.use infinity as your reference point

Homework Equations


V=-\int E* dl

gauss law = \int E *da=q/\epsilon_ 0

The Attempt at a Solution



This should be easy. Inside a solid sphere, E=0 so the potential inside sphere is zero. The electric field of a sphere is : E_sphere=(1/(4*\pi*\epsilon_ 0))*q/R^2 => V=-(1/(4*\pi*\epsilon_ 0))*q/R. Hmm... my solution is too easy; I know this solution was worked out in one of the examples found in my textbooks. Should I apply gauss law I take into account that dq=\rho*d\tau=\sigma*da where d\tau=(4/3)*\pi R^3andda=4*\pi*r^2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is only zero inside a conducting sphere. This is because all the charge migrates to the surface and it acts likes a hollow charged shell. In the question it does not say the sphere is conducting, it says it is uniformly charged. Therefore it must be acting as an insulating sphere, because a conducting sphere is not uniformly charged. Work it out assuming there is a field inside and you will get the right answer.

Also the potential inside a conducting sphere won't be zero, it will assume the value of the potential at the surface of the sphere.
 
Kalvarin said:
The electric field is only zero inside a conducting sphere. This is because all the charge migrates to the surface and it acts likes a hollow charged shell. In the question it does not say the sphere is conducting, it says it is uniformly charged. Therefore it must be acting as an insulating sphere, because a conducting sphere is not uniformly charged. Work it out assuming there is a field inside and you will get the right answer.

Also the potential inside a conducting sphere won't be zero, it will assume the value of the potential at the surface of the sphere.

I think I got it; for r>R, E(4*pi*r^2)=rho*(4/3*pi*R^3)/epilison_0 => and for R<r E(4*pi*r^2)==rho*(4/3*pi*R^3)/epilison_0
 
Last edited:
Yep that looks right.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top