Calculating the ratio between heat capacities of a gas

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of specific heats (gamma) for a gas using available data on pressures and volumes at different temperatures. Participants explore theoretical relationships and methods for determining gamma, considering the type of gas (monatomic or diatomic) and the nature of the transformation (adiabatic or diabatic).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that gamma can be calculated using the formula gamma = Cp / Cv and mentions the relationship Cp = Cv + R.
  • Another participant suggests that if the gas is undergoing adiabatic expansion, the relation PV^gamma = K can be used to find gamma and compare it with theoretical values.
  • A later reply clarifies that the relation holds for any adiabatic process, emphasizing no heat exchange occurs.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether the derived relations apply to adiabatic expansion and seeks further clarification.
  • Another participant describes their attempt to calculate gamma assuming the gas is monatomic and discusses the implications of canceling terms in their calculations, expressing concern over the validity of their approach.
  • There is mention of the energy equipartition theorem and its application to determine Cv for a monoatomic gas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of their calculations or the assumptions made regarding the type of gas. There is ongoing uncertainty about the validity of certain mathematical steps and the generalizability of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to determine the type of gas later in the discussion, which introduces additional complexity. There are also concerns about the assumptions made during calculations, particularly regarding the cancellation of variables.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in thermodynamics, specifically in understanding the calculations related to heat capacities and the behavior of gases under different transformations.

DoubleHelix
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi, my task is to calculate the ratio (gamma) between the specific heats of a gas (Cp and Cv). The only information I have is a table of data for the pressures and volumes of the gas at different temperatures. I don't know if its monatomic, diatomic etc. (it's a later task to determine this).

My attempt so far. I've been researching this for hours and I've discovered that the ratio I need to find is gamma = Cp / Cv. I've learned that Cp = Cv + R where R is the gas constant and that Cv = 3R/2 for a monatomic gas, 5R/2 for a diatomic gas and that Cp = 5R/2 for a monatomic gas, 7R/2 for a diatomic gas but have been unable to find where these numbers come from! I also found a useful formula that
gamma = 1 + (R/Cv) so I only really need to find either Cv or Cp using my data to solve this question.

Thanks for any help.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What kind of transformation is the gas doing?

If it is diabatic, then you can find \gamma from PV^{\gamma}=K, and then compare that value with the theoretical values of \frac{C_p}{C_v} and find out what kind of molecule the gas is made of.

Here's an example for a monoatomic gas: It has 3 translational degrees of freedom, no rotation and no vibration, so N=3, and by the energy equipartition theorem you have a total energy of
U=n(3+0+0)\frac{1}{2}RT
where n is the mole number.

In order to calculate C_v you can prove that
C_v=\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT})_{v=const}
and because
C_p=C_v+R you know the theoretical \gamma.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
After reading your reply I read through the question again and noticed that it mentions the the gas is undergoing adiabatic expansion in a later part of the question, I never read this far into the question before so I didn't realize. Would the relation you mentioned hold true for an adiabatic expansion? I'm going to do more research with this new found information!

Thanks a lot!
 
It holds for any adiabatic process,in other words, any process in which there is no heat exchange between the system and the surrounding universe.
 
Gunthi said:
What kind of transformation is the gas doing?

If it is diabatic, then you can find \gamma from PV^{\gamma}=K, and then compare that value with the theoretical values of \frac{C_p}{C_v} and find out what kind of molecule the gas is made of.

Here's an example for a monoatomic gas: It has 3 translational degrees of freedom, no rotation and no vibration, so N=3, and by the energy equipartition theorem you have a total energy of
U=n(3+0+0)\frac{1}{2}RT
where n is the mole number.

In order to calculate C_v you can prove that
C_v=\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT})_{v=const}
and because
C_p=C_v+R you know the theoretical \gamma.

OK so I had a go at using the method you told me and, I did:
\frac{C_p}{C_v} = \frac{C_v + R}{C_v}
= \frac{\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT}) + R}{\frac{1}{n}(\frac{dU}{dT})}

And assumed (for now) that it is a monatomic gas to calculate a set of U values which I plotted against the T values and drew a trendline through these points to get the gradient. Now, I (wrongly) canceled the top and bottom n to get

\frac{C_p}{C_v} = \frac{(\frac{dU}{dT}) + R}{(\frac{dU}{dT})}

and substituted the values into get 1.66 which relates to H or He. However, as I stated I wrongly canceled the ns I think, or am I allowed the cancel the ns? This means n must equal 1 BUT it's a later part of the question to calculate n which is why I'm panicing a little! Also I assumed monatomic gas, is there no way to do this for a general case because it's also a later part of the question to determine if its monatomic/diatomic etc. lol. I have all the answers but in the wrong order!
Thanks a lot anyway, you've been a great help. Do you have any other ideas?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K