Calculating the root mean square speed from pressure and density.

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the root mean square speed of gas molecules in a tire with a pressure of 150 kPa and a density of 2.0 kg/m³, the equation p = (1/3)ρ<c²> is used, leading to <c²> = 225,000 m²/s². The correct root mean square speed is then found to be 474 m/s, which is the square root of <c²>. There is confusion regarding the inclusion of N in the equation for c_rms, as it seems unnecessary and could lead to incorrect interpretations. The discussion clarifies that <c²> should be derived from the sum of the squares of individual speeds divided by the number of particles, without needing to divide by N for the final rms speed calculation. Understanding these equations correctly is essential for accurate calculations in gas dynamics.
Jamesey162
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A tyre contains gas at a pressure of 150 kPa. If the gas has a density of 2.0 kg m-3, find the root mean square speed of the molecules.

Homework Equations



These are the equations I believe to be relevant:

c_{rms} = \frac{\sqrt{&lt;c^2&gt;}}{N}

pV = \frac{1}{3}Nm&lt;c^2&gt;

p = \frac{1}{3}ρ&lt;c^2&gt;

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{3p}{ρ} = &lt;c^2&gt;
\frac{3 * 150000}{2} = &lt;c^2&gt; = 225000ms^{-1}

But I'm not sure how to work out N as I don't any volume or temperature. I'm not quite sure how they get their answer in the back of the book which is 474 ms-1 (which is the square root of 225000) meaning that N = 1? How can that be?

Thank you for reading!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If c^2 = 225000, then the units can't be m/s
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
SteamKing said:
If c^2 = 225000, then the units can't be m/s

Sorry yes <c^2> should be in m^2s^-2 shouldn't it?
 
Jamesey162 said:
c_{rms} = \frac{\sqrt{&lt;c^2&gt;}}{N}
Are you sure there should be an ##N## here?
 
BruceW said:
Are you sure there should be an ##N## here?

I'm sure, atleast that's how they have quoted it in my textbook:

WEareEe.jpg
 
How does your book define <c^2>?

ehild
 
ehild said:
How does your book define <c^2>?

ehild

It defines it as:

&lt;c^2&gt; = \frac{{c_1}^2 + {c_2}^2 + {c_3}^2 + ...{c_N}^2}{N} = \frac{{c_i}^2}{N}

I'm not exactly sure what the right-hand most part means with the subscript i.
 
Jamesey162 said:
It defines it as:

&lt;c^2&gt; = \frac{{c_1}^2 + {c_2}^2 + {c_3}^2 + ...{c_N}^2}{N} = \frac{{c_i}^2}{N}

I'm not exactly sure what the right-hand most part means with the subscript i.

It should be

&lt;c^2&gt; = \frac{{c_1}^2 + {c_2}^2 + {c_3}^2 + ...{c_N}^2}{N} =\frac{\sum{{c_i}^2}}{N}

i is the summation index, and √<c2> itself is the rms speed. No need to divide it by N. \frac{3p}{ρ} = &lt;c^2&gt;

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
yeah, I think what ehild said is right. The equation
c_{rms} = \frac{\sqrt{&lt;c^2&gt;}}{N}
is most likely a mistake in the book. It doesn't make sense, if you think about it. If you had a bunch of atoms all moving at the same speed, then this equation would give an rms value that is smaller for a larger population of these identical atoms. Which doesn't make sense at all.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
ehild said:
It should be

&lt;c^2&gt; = \frac{{c_1}^2 + {c_2}^2 + {c_3}^2 + ...{c_N}^2}{N} =\frac{\sum{{c_i}^2}}{N}

i is the summation index, and √<c2> itself is the rms speed. No need to divide it by N. \frac{3p}{ρ} = &lt;c^2&gt;

ehild

BruceW said:
yeah, I think what ehild said is right. The equation
c_{rms} = \frac{\sqrt{&lt;c^2&gt;}}{N}
is most likely a mistake in the book. It doesn't make sense, if you think about it. If you had a bunch of atoms all moving at the same speed, then this equation would give an rms value that is smaller for a larger population of these identical atoms. Which doesn't make sense at all.
Okay, I've got it now, thanks for the explanation.
 
Back
Top