Calculating the Speed Needed for a Successful Motorcycle Jump Across a River

  • Thread starter Thread starter tentoes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Motorcycle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the speed required for a motorcyclist to successfully jump across a river, taking into account the angle of the ramp, the width of the river, and the height difference between the ramp and the far bank. The context is rooted in projectile motion and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations of motion in both x and y directions, attempting to relate time, initial velocity, and the conditions of the jump. There are questions regarding the correctness of algebraic manipulations and the interpretation of velocity terms.

Discussion Status

Some participants are revisiting their calculations and questioning their algebraic steps. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the use of velocity terms and the relationship between average and initial velocities. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly applying the equations of motion and the potential for algebraic errors. There is a mention of the problem's complexity as it relates to the current pace of the class material.

tentoes
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Problem: A motorcyclist is about to jump across a river. The takeoff ramp is inclined at 53 degrees above the horizontal, the river is 40.0m wide, and the far bank is 15.0m lower than the top of the ramp. Ignore air resistance. What must the motorcyclist's speed be at the top of the ramp in order to just make it to the edge of the far bank?
So I know that in the x-direction: a=0, v=initial velocity * cos(53), position=Vi*cos(53)*t
and in the y direction: a=-9.8, V=-9.8*t+Vi*sin(53), position = -4.8t^2+Vi*sin(53)+15 (if "origin" here is (0, 15).So I'm missing time and initial velocity, but the equation for velocity in the x direction doesn't have t in it, so I know V=40/t, and so Vi=40/(t*cos(53)). Then I can plug that equation in for Vi in the y-position equation and solve for t (so I have t= √(((40*sin(53)/cos(53))+15)/4.8) so t=3.77 seconds, and plug that value into either velocity equation, and I get 10.61m/s. Only problem is, this is the wrong answer, and the correct one is 17.8m/s - so where am I going wrong here? I've looked at a couple of explanations of this problem not involving an overall change in y and I understand why this should work, but I've redone and gone over the problem multiple times now and there is no 17.8m/s to be found!

so I have t= √(((40*sin(53)/cos(53))+15)/4.8
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Correction - because I get (40*sin(53)*t)/cos(53)*t, the t's cancel so I didn't use my calculator, I used algebra. Which is generally where my errors enter!
 
4.9 m/s² ... and I think your velocity term didn't get its sign reversed.
 
Oops on the 4.9 - but even changing that my answer is still far from correct. Which velocity term do you mean? -4.9t^2 just goes on the other side and become positive so all terms are positive.
 
tentoes said:
so t=3.77 seconds, and plug that value into either velocity equation, and I get 10.61m/s.
I get t = 3.73, but even if I take t=3.77 and plug it into your Vi*cos(53)*t equation I get a number quite close to the answer. Please post all your working.
 
Aha! It's my algebra. I was using the original Vx = 40/t, but NOT using the entire expression, which is (40/t)/cos(53) = 17.63 I guess 40/t gives you the average velocity, but that is not equal to the initial velocity - right? I also tried plugging in t=3.77 back into the Vy equation, but I got a huge number - I'm not sure exactly why that wouldn't work, except that t=3.77 is the "zero" of that equation.

Thanks for your help - hopefully now that I know where I went wrong this type of question will seem as easy as it should be (since we're moving rapidly past this type of problem in class now.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K