Calculating the Speed of a Cylinder on a Frictional Ramp

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a uniform solid cylinder rolling down a frictional ramp and around a loop. The problem involves concepts of potential energy, kinetic energy, and rotational kinetic energy, as well as the moment of inertia of the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationships between potential energy, kinetic energy, and rotational kinetic energy in the context of the cylinder's motion. There is a focus on the effects of friction and the moment of inertia, with some questioning the treatment of the radii involved in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the formulas used and the implications of friction in the energy conservation context. Some guidance has been offered regarding the moment of inertia and the role of friction in rolling motion, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the radii of the cylinder and the loop, as well as the treatment of friction in the energy equations. The original poster acknowledges a mistake in their calculations and seeks clarification on the relevance of friction in this scenario.

delecticious
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform solid cylinder (m=0.230 kg, of small radius) is at the top of a similar ramp, which has friction. The cylinder starts from rest and rolls down the ramp without sliding and goes around the loop. Find the speed of the cylinder at the top of the loop.

prob26b_1015cyl.gif

Homework Equations



PE - potential energy
KE - kinetic energy
KEr - rotational kinetic energy
I - moment of inertia
w - omega

KE0 + PE0 + KEr0 = KEf + PEf + KErf

The Attempt at a Solution



At first I was tripped up over the small radius part, until I realized that the radius would cancel out with final height of the potential energy and I deduced that the initial rotational and kinetic energies would cancel out to get something to this fashion:

mgh0 = 1/2mv^2 + mg2R + 1/2Iw^2
mgh0 = 1/2mv^2 + mg2R + 1/2I(v^2/r^2)
mgh0 = 1/2mv^2 + mg + 1/2Iv^2

I plugged and chugged my numbers to get a velocity of 7.18, but then I realized I forgot to incorporate the friction force, so how would that fit into the mathematical equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
delecticious said:
mgh0 = 1/2mv^2 + mg2R + 1/2Iw^2
mgh0 = 1/2mv^2 + mg2R + 1/2I(v^2/r^2)
OK.
mgh0 = 1/2mv^2 + mg + 1/2Iv^2
Not sure what you did here. What happened to R and r?

I plugged and chugged my numbers to get a velocity of 7.18, but then I realized I forgot to incorporate the friction force, so how would that fit into the mathematical equation?
I didn't do the calculation myself, but you need to double check your formulas. What did you use for I?

Since the cylinder rolls without slipping, no energy is lost to friction: Mechanical energy is conserved.
 
Doc Al said:
OK.

Not sure what you did here. What happened to R and r?
sorry, R=r so I should have had them in the same caps. Since they're the same I canceled them out

I didn't do the calculation myself, but you need to double check your formulas. What did you use for I?
I = 1/2MR^2 <---- I looked it up in my book and it said the moment of inertia for solid cylinders is that
Since the cylinder rolls without slipping, no energy is lost to friction: Mechanical energy is conserved.

so does that mean the fact that there is friction is negligible in this situation?
 
delecticious said:
sorry, R=r so I should have had them in the same caps. Since they're the same I canceled them out
R is the radius of the loop; r is the radius of the rolling cylinder. They are not the same. (And even if they were, how would they cancel?)

Rewrite the final equation that you used to get your answer.


I = 1/2MR^2 <---- I looked it up in my book and it said the moment of inertia for solid cylinders is that
Good.


so does that mean the fact that there is friction is negligible in this situation?
It's not that the friction is negligibly small, and thus can be ignored. Friction is essential--it's what makes the cylinder roll instead of slide. But from an energy point of view, the friction does no work so energy is still conserved. (So it has no effect on your energy equation.)
 
Doc Al said:
R is the radius of the loop; r is the radius of the rolling cylinder. They are not the same. (And even if they were, how would they cancel?)
looks like goofed here. Ok so R stays, but r isn't given so somehow it drops out, but I'm not sure how it would.
 
Small r appears in the formula for I.
 
oh, no duh, thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K